2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00027-008-8090-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of spawning salmon on dissolved nutrients and epilithon in coupled stream-estuary systems of southeastern Alaska

Abstract: Spawning migrations of Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) represent a significant nutrient pulse to freshwater ecosystems of southeastern Alaska. These salmon-derived nutrients (SDN) can be transported by streamflow from spawning reaches of streams to estuaries, where their fate and significance have not been studied. Such estuaries represent an important aquatic ecotone in southeastern Alaska, especially for juvenile salmonids. We sampled dissolved nutrients and epilithon (i.e., benthic algae attached to rock… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(69 reference statements)
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, export of nutrients and organic matter driven by this disturbance may lead to increased delivery of salmon nutrients to downstream river reaches (Albers and Petticrew 2012), rearing lakes (Moore et al 2007), and estuaries (Cak et al 2008), and in some cases, these exported nutrients have been linked to increased biofilm standing crop in these downstream ecosystems (Albers and Petticrew 2012). Therefore, the effects of salmon spawning may be more appropriately viewed at the scale of stream segments or watersheds, rather than reaches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, export of nutrients and organic matter driven by this disturbance may lead to increased delivery of salmon nutrients to downstream river reaches (Albers and Petticrew 2012), rearing lakes (Moore et al 2007), and estuaries (Cak et al 2008), and in some cases, these exported nutrients have been linked to increased biofilm standing crop in these downstream ecosystems (Albers and Petticrew 2012). Therefore, the effects of salmon spawning may be more appropriately viewed at the scale of stream segments or watersheds, rather than reaches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the net effects of spawning salmon can vary (Harding et al 2014); salmon can subsidize freshwater and riparian habitats through excretion and egg and carcass deposition (Kline et al 1990, Cederholm et al 1999, Janetski et al 2009, and can export nutrients with juvenile emigration and disturbance as adults dig and defend nests (Moore et al 2007, Kohler et al 2013. Although considerable amounts of salmon-derived nutrients imported into coastal watersheds are retained, large proportions are also exported downstream to estuaries (Gende et al 2004, Mitchell and Lamberti 2005, Cak et al 2008. The influence of salmon nutrients in estuaries has received some mention (Reimchen 1994, Wipfli et al 1998, Cederholm et al 1999, Lessard and Merritt 2006, Field and Reynolds 2013, but research on the topic is limited (Fujiwara and Highsmith 1997, Jauquet et al 2003, Cak et al 2008.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although considerable amounts of salmon-derived nutrients imported into coastal watersheds are retained, large proportions are also exported downstream to estuaries (Gende et al 2004, Mitchell and Lamberti 2005, Cak et al 2008. The influence of salmon nutrients in estuaries has received some mention (Reimchen 1994, Wipfli et al 1998, Cederholm et al 1999, Lessard and Merritt 2006, Field and Reynolds 2013, but research on the topic is limited (Fujiwara and Highsmith 1997, Jauquet et al 2003, Cak et al 2008. However, the potential for estuaries to be affected by salmon nutrient subsidies is considerable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enclosures were considered to be adequately independent to merit an ANOVA approach, although we acknowledge that some temporal dependence may exist (Cak et al 2008). The minimum adequate model for each parameter was determined by comparing the Fratio of a full and reduced ANOVA model (Whittingham et al 2006).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%