2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2022.738082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of spatial scale on assessments of suspension bivalve aquaculture for productivity and environmental impacts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increasing differences in carbon flux between the scenarios (with and without farm) over time indicate an effect of clam growth, as larger body size is commonly related to higher ingestion and egestion rates . Clam growth is also strongly linked to environmental factors, e.g., temperature and seston concentration, which consequently also affect benthic carbon flux.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The increasing differences in carbon flux between the scenarios (with and without farm) over time indicate an effect of clam growth, as larger body size is commonly related to higher ingestion and egestion rates . Clam growth is also strongly linked to environmental factors, e.g., temperature and seston concentration, which consequently also affect benthic carbon flux.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organic carbon was assumed to originate from terrestrial and marine sources, as well as biodeposits specifically, as these three sources are widely recognized as the main components in coastal bivalve farms. , Each component is defined by distinctive δ 13 C and δ 15 N signatures that are used to quantify the contribution of each component to the TOC of sediments. The different source proportions were estimated based on the δ 13 C and δ 15 N three-end-member mixing model …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aquaculture allows for the systematic and stable production of aquatic organisms and thus plays an important role in the marine product supply (Diana, 2009). However, marine aquaculture is known to generate environmental impact in the form of organic matter such as feed (leftovers) and feces on the aquaculture sites and surrounding areas (Carroll et al., 2003; Sakamaki et al., 2022), which can potentially alter the local biodiversity (Pietros & Rice, 2003; Sakamaki et al., 2022; Sasaki et al., 2002; Tsutsumi, 1995; Tsutsumi & Inoue, 1996). While less mobile macrobenthos were traditionally used as bioindicators to evaluate the impact of aquaculture on the local ecosystem (Frühe et al., 2021; Yokoyama et al., 2002), little is understood about the potential impacts on fish communities despite the ecological and economic importance of fish in marine ecosystems (Tsuyuki & Umino, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%