2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.amar.2015.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of spatial correlation in random parameters collision count-data models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One solution to account for unobserved heterogeneity across observations in crash frequency analysis is to adopt random parameters count data models (Lord and Mannering, 2010;Chen and Tarko, 2014;Venkataraman et al, 2014;Barua et al, 2015Barua et al, , 2016Coruh et al, 2015;Alarifi et al, 2017;Bhat et al, 2017;Chen et al, 2017;Rista et al, 2017). Compared to fixed parameters models assuming the same effects of factors on all observations, random parameters models can capture the observation-specific effects of factors on crash frequency and have also been widely applied in crash injury severity analyses (Russo et al, 2014;Zhao and Khattak, 2015, Behnood and Mannering, 2016, 2017a, 2017bNaik et al, 2016;Anderson and Hernandez, 2017;Fountas and Anastasopoulos, 2017;Seraneeprakarn et al, 2017) and crash rate analyses (Anastasopoulos, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One solution to account for unobserved heterogeneity across observations in crash frequency analysis is to adopt random parameters count data models (Lord and Mannering, 2010;Chen and Tarko, 2014;Venkataraman et al, 2014;Barua et al, 2015Barua et al, , 2016Coruh et al, 2015;Alarifi et al, 2017;Bhat et al, 2017;Chen et al, 2017;Rista et al, 2017). Compared to fixed parameters models assuming the same effects of factors on all observations, random parameters models can capture the observation-specific effects of factors on crash frequency and have also been widely applied in crash injury severity analyses (Russo et al, 2014;Zhao and Khattak, 2015, Behnood and Mannering, 2016, 2017a, 2017bNaik et al, 2016;Anderson and Hernandez, 2017;Fountas and Anastasopoulos, 2017;Seraneeprakarn et al, 2017) and crash rate analyses (Anastasopoulos, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter does not imply the certainty of perfectly safe roadway segments, but the possibility that over a period of time accidents may not occur on some roadway segments. In fact, numerous studies (Abdel-Aty and Radwan, 2000;Anastasopoulos et al, 2008;Geedipally and Lord, 2010;Anwaar et al, 2012;Mohammadi et al, 2014;Zou et al, 2014;Barua et al, 2015; for a detailed list, see Lord and Mannering (2010)) have presented a great amount of roadway segments of varying lengths (from a few hundred feet to several miles) with zero accidents over their corresponding finite study periods, ranging from a few months to multiple years. Even though these zero-accident roadway segments are not considered as very low accident risk segments, they form the basis to compare segments with (or with a large amount of) accidents and identify safety countermeasures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…can serve as an indicator to assess the 24 relative strength of spatial and unstructured variations in the estimated coefficients. Besides, if 25 there is no significant heterogeneity in k β , the 2 k  then displays a dispersion with the mean 26 of its posterior distribution lower than the standard deviation (Barua et al, 2015). In this case, 27 the regression slopes are better fitted as the fixed effects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%