UV/Optical/IR Space Telescopes and Instruments: Innovative Technologies and Concepts VIII 2017
DOI: 10.1117/12.2273072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of space telescope primary mirror segment errors on coronagraph instrument performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, these rigorously derived analytical results are similar to and consistent with our previously published numerical simulation results. [11][12][13][14][15] Also note that the allocation between modes can be further refined on a case-by-case basis depending upon which modes are mostly likely to occur in a given telescope implementation.…”
Section: Linking the Error Budget To Requirements On Wavefront Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, these rigorously derived analytical results are similar to and consistent with our previously published numerical simulation results. [11][12][13][14][15] Also note that the allocation between modes can be further refined on a case-by-case basis depending upon which modes are mostly likely to occur in a given telescope implementation.…”
Section: Linking the Error Budget To Requirements On Wavefront Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 And the tolerable amplitude depends on the coronagraph's sensitivity to that error, as well as the error mode's spatial and temporal characteristics. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] References 11-18 each calculated candidate coronagraph's contrast leakage as a function of wavefront error mode. References 11-15 used numerical simulations to calculate contrast leakage for Seidel aberrations and segmented aperture piston and tip/tilt error.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[44][45][46][47] Studies performing Monte Carlo (MC) end-to-end (E2E) simulations 48,49 have confirmed the strict WFE requirements of a couple of tens of picometers over tens of minutes to enable the search for faint extra-solar planets, and analytical methods for the derivation of coronagraphic performance specifications have been proposed. 50,51 One thing that all of these studies have in common is that they define global WFE tolerances over the entire telescope pupil, where the segments have a random contribution to the overall aberrations. In this paper, we focus on analytically defining requirements on a segment-tosegment basis instead, using the Pair-based Analytical model for Segmented Telescope Imaging from Space (PASTIS), [52][53][54] which models the DH average contrast of a coronagraph on a segmented telescope as a function of the segment aberrations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resolving an Earth-like planet near a Sun-like star with a telescope requires instruments that are able to image at extremely high contrasts of 10-10 [12]. Achieving this contrast level with a coronagraph instrument, which blocks out the light of the target star so the dim companion planet is visible, requires an adaptive optics system capable of picometer-level wavefront control [13]. Deformable mirrors can be used in coronagraph systems to control the wavefront in order to prevent speckles and stray light from degrading the contrast [13,14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Achieving this contrast level with a coronagraph instrument, which blocks out the light of the target star so the dim companion planet is visible, requires an adaptive optics system capable of picometer-level wavefront control [13]. Deformable mirrors can be used in coronagraph systems to control the wavefront in order to prevent speckles and stray light from degrading the contrast [13,14,15]. Picometer-level control has been demonstrated at the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) High Contrast Imaging Testbed [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%