2018
DOI: 10.1016/s1002-0160(18)60035-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Soluble Silicate and Nanosilica Application on Rice Nutrition in an Oxisol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1), with maximum accumulation (greater maximum value of 142.32 mg plant −1 , corresponding to silicon concentration of 1.34 g L −1 ) in comparison to the other sources. These results can be explained by the size of nanosilica particles, which is mostly (70%) 100 nm (Félix Alvarez et al 2018). This facilitates its foliar absorption in comparison to the other sources.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…1), with maximum accumulation (greater maximum value of 142.32 mg plant −1 , corresponding to silicon concentration of 1.34 g L −1 ) in comparison to the other sources. These results can be explained by the size of nanosilica particles, which is mostly (70%) 100 nm (Félix Alvarez et al 2018). This facilitates its foliar absorption in comparison to the other sources.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The authors, citing some of their previous studies, concluded that the Si foliar application was not as performing as the application to soil, although confirming most of the findings despite to a lesser extent. The indirect influence of nano Si on plant nutrition was not confirmed on rice [86].…”
Section: Si Nanoparticles As Plant Nutrient Carriermentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Sideficient soils can be corrected by several sources that vary widely in total and plant-available silicon (Keeping 2017). Most research in Brazil tested calcium silicates and steel slag as Si fertilizers (Alvarez et al 2018;Camargo et al 2013;Deus and Büll 2013;Preston et al 2020). Such sources pose some drawbacks, such as low content of plant-available Si or high levels of heavy metals, requiring large amounts of fertilizer to reach the crop demand, or increase soil contamination risk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%