2007
DOI: 10.1002/jpln.200625015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of soil flooding on P transformations in soils of the Mesopotamia region, Argentina

Abstract: In the Mesopotamia region (Argentina), rice is cropped on a wide range of soil types, and the response of rice to fertilizer application has been inconsistent even in soils with very low levels of available phosphorus. Phosphorus transformations in flooded soils depend on soil characteristics that may affect phosphorus availability. This study was conducted to determine which soil characteristics were related to the changes in P fractions during soil flooding. Soils were chosen from ten sites within the Mesopo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results identified amorphous Fe(III) and Al minerals as the best predictors of soil PSI values but not Fe(II) minerals. These results suggest that soil Fe(II) minerals alone were in- sufficient to explain P sorption capacity compared to Fe(III) or Al minerals, consistent with previous studies (Sallade and Sims, 1997;Quintero et al, 2007;Rakotoson et al, 2014). However, soil Fe(III) and Al minerals were less responsive to redox manipulation compared to Fe(II) minerals.…”
Section: Phosphorus Sorption and Fe And Al Mineralssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results identified amorphous Fe(III) and Al minerals as the best predictors of soil PSI values but not Fe(II) minerals. These results suggest that soil Fe(II) minerals alone were in- sufficient to explain P sorption capacity compared to Fe(III) or Al minerals, consistent with previous studies (Sallade and Sims, 1997;Quintero et al, 2007;Rakotoson et al, 2014). However, soil Fe(III) and Al minerals were less responsive to redox manipulation compared to Fe(II) minerals.…”
Section: Phosphorus Sorption and Fe And Al Mineralssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…These soils often contain high concentrations of redox-sensitive poorly crystalline or amorphous Fe minerals (Hall and Silver, 2015;Wilmoth et al, 2018;de Campos et al, 2016). Under anoxic conditions, Fe(III) minerals undergo reductive dissolution and are transformed into Fe(II) phases that are assumed to be less effective at binding P (Quintero et al, 2007;Rakotoson et al, 2014;Shenker et al, 2005). Reducing conditions increase pH and decrease surface charges that are thought to be central to P sorption (Oh et al, 1999;Willett, 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After 10 d of draining, the concentrations of Fe-P, Al-P, and O-P during the reflooding period were greater than those during the flooding period. Several studies have examined P transformations in flooded-drained soils [9,14,40,46,47]. Furthermore, Ca-P was different in the four soils and increased only in the soil with high initial Ca-P.…”
Section: Soil P Following Long-term Flooding Draining and Refloodingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have examined soil P adsorption and release, especially under flooded conditions [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Flooding and draining causes chemical changes in soils, which leads to the dynamic…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent decrease in the released P concentration is sometimes observed because of resorption of P on clays and metal oxyhydroxides or because of precipitation of Fe(II)-P compounds (Amery & Smolders, 2012). The extent of P release by flooding differs among soil types (Ponnamperuma, 1985;Quintero et al, 2007). The increase in soluble P in soil due to Fe(III) reduction ranges up to 10-fold among different soils (Ann et al, 2000;Peretyazhko & Sposito, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%