1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf02357850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of soil-borneRhizoctonia solani Kühn on yield and quality of ten potato cultivars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
2

Year Published

1989
1989
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Planting time, tuber treatments and time of emergence were equal for both cultivars. Differences between cultivars for susceptibility to stem canker were also found for other cultivars (Scholte, 1989b). In experiment 3 each plot was divided into two: one half received a yearly quantity of 170 kg N ha -1 and the other half yearly 230 kg.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Planting time, tuber treatments and time of emergence were equal for both cultivars. Differences between cultivars for susceptibility to stem canker were also found for other cultivars (Scholte, 1989b). In experiment 3 each plot was divided into two: one half received a yearly quantity of 170 kg N ha -1 and the other half yearly 230 kg.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incidence of stem canker was assessed in all experiments ca 10 weeks after planting by visible rating (Scholte, 1989b) of the 18-30 harvested plants per plot. From these results an index (0-100) was calculated (see under scab).…”
Section: Assessment Of Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The infection from the soil was not a problem when potatoes were grown at intervals of five years or more. As cultivation of potatoes became more profitable, the frequency of potato growing increased and also the damage from R. solani (Schölte, 1987(Schölte, , 1989Lamers, 1989). Besides, the formation of sclerotia on young tubers was aggravated by chemical haulm destruction (Mulder et al, 1979;Dijst, 1985), a common farm practice that should be replaced by a method of harvesting that does not stimulate formation of sclerotia (Dijst, 1985;Turkensteen et al, 1989).…”
Section: Rhizoctoniamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simons and Gilligan 1997). It may however substantially degrade tuber quality and marketability, which is the consequence of one or more of the following: (a) hard sclerotia on tuber surfaces (black scurf), (b) greater numbers of non-target size tubers, (c) tuber greening, (d) sessile tubers or 'little potato' and (e) malformed tubers (Scholte 1989;Simons and Gilligan 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%