2006
DOI: 10.1152/ajprenal.00334.2005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of sodium nitrite on ischemia-reperfusion injury in the rat kidney

Abstract: . Effects of sodium nitrite on ischemia-reperfusion injury in the rat kidney. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 290: F779 -F786, 2006. First published November 8, 2005 doi:10.1152/ajprenal.00334.2005.-Reactive oxygen and nitrogen species play a key role in the pathophysiology of renal ischemiareperfusion (I/R) injury. Recent studies have shown that nitrite (NO 2 Ϫ ) serves as an endogenous source of nitric oxide (NO), particularly in the presence of hypoxia and acidosis. Nanomolar concentrations of NO 2 Ϫ reduce inj… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
49
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
3
49
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is interesting that whereas topical nitrite administration was of clear benefit, intravenous administration of nitrite had no effect on the renal dysfunction and injury that were caused by the I/R insult, confirming the recent study of Basireddy et al (23). Because the concentration of nitrite that was used in this study was the same for both routes (60 mol/L, identical to that of Basireddy et al) and the timing of nitrite application at 1 min before reperfusion (i.e., 59 min in to the ischemic event) was the same in both protocols, it is likely that the route of administration underlies the difference in efficacy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is interesting that whereas topical nitrite administration was of clear benefit, intravenous administration of nitrite had no effect on the renal dysfunction and injury that were caused by the I/R insult, confirming the recent study of Basireddy et al (23). Because the concentration of nitrite that was used in this study was the same for both routes (60 mol/L, identical to that of Basireddy et al) and the timing of nitrite application at 1 min before reperfusion (i.e., 59 min in to the ischemic event) was the same in both protocols, it is likely that the route of administration underlies the difference in efficacy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…There is evidence that the systemic administration of nitrite does not reduce renal I/R in the rat (23). However, we investigated whether direct topical application of sodium nitrite to the renal surface in vivo reduces renal dysfunction, injury, and inflammation in a rat model of I/R injury.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This concept has led to studies testing nitrite as a direct NO donor in experimental ischemia models, such as hypoxiainduced pulmonary vasoconstriction, 18 hemorrhagic stroke, 19 hepatic and cardiac I/R injury, 13 and renal I/R injury. 20 Nitrite exerted profound dose-dependent protective effects against hepatic and myocardial I/R, although it did not provide protection in renal I/R injury, suggesting a unique metabolism of nitrite in each tissue. 15,20 Cerebral ischemia also decreases the extracellular pH and oxygen level in the brain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…20 Nitrite exerted profound dose-dependent protective effects against hepatic and myocardial I/R, although it did not provide protection in renal I/R injury, suggesting a unique metabolism of nitrite in each tissue. 15,20 Cerebral ischemia also decreases the extracellular pH and oxygen level in the brain. Therefore, NO can be generated efficiently in the ischemic brain by direct reduction of nitrite.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In experimental settings, intravenously administered sodium nitrite has been reported to protect against ischemia-reperfusion injury in the heart and liver (Duranski et al, 2005) but not the kidney (Basireddy et al, 2006), and was recently described as a neuroprotectant (Jung et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%