2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2006.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of social anxiety and evaluative threat on cardiovascular responses to active performance situations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants were assigned to social anxiety groups on the basis of a median split of the final distribution of test scores (M = 11.43, SD = 5.12). The sample mean was comparable to means observed by Lück and cutoff criteria employed in previous research noting cardiovascular and psychological effects of social anxiety [17,18]. The mean score for high socially anxious individuals was 15.53 (SD = 3.43), the mean score for low socially anxious individuals was 7.33 (SD = 2.60), p < 0.0001.…”
Section: Methods Participantssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Participants were assigned to social anxiety groups on the basis of a median split of the final distribution of test scores (M = 11.43, SD = 5.12). The sample mean was comparable to means observed by Lück and cutoff criteria employed in previous research noting cardiovascular and psychological effects of social anxiety [17,18]. The mean score for high socially anxious individuals was 15.53 (SD = 3.43), the mean score for low socially anxious individuals was 7.33 (SD = 2.60), p < 0.0001.…”
Section: Methods Participantssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Replicating prior research [17,44], cardiac activity was unrelated to affective arousal. Interestingly, differential effects of enhanced self-focus were confined to speech preparation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Nevertheless, the extant literature remains opaque regarding the relationship between social anxiety and physiological responses to evaluative threat -indeed, examination of potential moderators of autonomic responses to social evaluation as a function of social anxiety continues to be called for FEARS OF EVALUATION AND RESPONSES TO SOCIAL THREAT 6 (Jamieson, Nock, & Mendes, 2013). Across a number of studies to date (although also see below for a number of exceptions), greater social anxiety has been linked to greater heart rate in response to social threat (e.g., see Davidson, Marshall, Tomarken, & Henriques, 2000;Gerlach, Wilhelm, & Roth, 2003;Gerlach, Mourlane, & Rist, 2004;Gramer & Saria, 2007;Grossman et al, 2001). Although a number of studies have failed to support this link (see also Edelmann & Baker, 2002;Hofmann, 2006;Jamieson et al, 2013;Mauss, Wilhelm, & Gross, 2003;Panayiotou & Vrana, 1998;Wilhelm, Kochar, Roth, & Gross, 2001), it nonetheless seems reasonable to conclude that heart rate can, at least under certain conditions (e.g., see Procedure section for an example of such conditions), serve as a valid, global index of sympathetic arousal in response to social threat.…”
Section: Fears Of Evaluation and Responses To Social Threatmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…14 social anxiety: Gramer & Saria, 2007; but see also, e.g., Edelmann & Baker, 2002;e.g., FNE: Papageorgiou & Wells, 2002). The CNAP TM Monitor 500 (CNSystems; Graz, Austria) used in the present study also assesses systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP); thus, the latter three indices were also examined in response to the speech, for exploratory purposes.…”
Section: Fears Of Evaluation and Responses To Social Threatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been stated that task difficulty drives active effort as long as success is perceived as possible and worthwhile (Wright, 1996), and cardiovascular response magnitude is proportional to mental effort (Callister et al, 1992;Eubanks et al, 2002;Gendolla and Richter, 2006;Gramer and Saria, 2007;Iani et al, 2004;Richter et al, 2008;Vincent et al, 1996, Wright, 1996. Such mental stress effects are based upon dynamic relations between cardiovascular variables such as heart rate and blood pressure (Berntson et al, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%