1999
DOI: 10.3102/00346543069001021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Small-Group Learning on Undergraduates in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology: A Meta-Analysis

Abstract: Recent calls for instructional innovation in undergraduate science, mathematics, engineering, and technology (SMET) courses and programs highlight the need for a solid foundation of education research at the undergraduate level on which to base policy and practice. We report herein the results of a meta-analysis that integrates research on undergraduate SMET education since 1980. The meta-analysis demonstrates that various forms of small-group learning are effective in promoting greater academic achievement, m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

22
723
1
13

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,439 publications
(759 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
22
723
1
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies indicate that people involved in cooperative learning demonstrate greater effort to achieve than people learning on their own (Roseth, Johnson & Johnson 2008;Springer, Stanne & Donovan 1999). From research, it is clear that cooperative learning should meet certain criteria in order for it to contribute to selfdirected learning ).…”
Section: Discussion: the Affordances Of Case-based Teaching For Fostementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies indicate that people involved in cooperative learning demonstrate greater effort to achieve than people learning on their own (Roseth, Johnson & Johnson 2008;Springer, Stanne & Donovan 1999). From research, it is clear that cooperative learning should meet certain criteria in order for it to contribute to selfdirected learning ).…”
Section: Discussion: the Affordances Of Case-based Teaching For Fostementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These researchers identify five principles to guide effective groups (a) positive interdependence, (b) face-to-face promotive interaction, (c) individual accountability, (d) interpersonal skill development, and (e) group processing of activities. Meta-analysis studies validate the value of small group learning for students of predicted high and low academic preparation levels (Springer, Stanne, & Donovan, 1999). The PAL program follows these principles and implements many of the specific small group learning activities recommended by them.…”
Section: Acquiring Knowledge a Classic Approach To Learning Is The Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collaborative learning is when students work in groups and engage in exploration on a topic (Bruffee, 1999). Benefits of engaging in collaborative learning include increasing cognitive processing (Kirschner, Paas, & Kirschner, 2009), improving student engagement in learning material (Shimazoe & Aldrich, 2010), fostering open-minded thinking (Chen, 2014), and subsequently encouraging critical thinking (Springer, Stanne, & Donovan, 1999). The literature on students' roles in collaborative learning has been well-documented, and its success can be attributed to two broad reasons: peers motivating and supporting each other, and peers learning from each other.…”
Section: Obvious Role: Collaborative Learning In Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%