1999
DOI: 10.2307/1170643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Small-Group Learning on Undergraduates in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology: A Meta-Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

14
356
2
7

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 306 publications
(379 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
14
356
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Increased engagement through PBL strategies has been shown to improve achievement and selfefficacy among middle school students [24], as well as boost their intrinsic goal orientation, task value, use of elaboration learning strategies, critical thinking, and peer learning, when compared to non-PBL instruction [44]. Walker and Leary's [46] meta-analysis of 82 PBL studies and Springer et al's [43] meta-analytical study showed PBL in small groups supported high-need students' success in STEM fields. Gallagher and Gallagher [16] also reported that PBL instruction could surface students who had previously unseen academic potential, meaning the learning strategy not only…”
Section: What To Learnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased engagement through PBL strategies has been shown to improve achievement and selfefficacy among middle school students [24], as well as boost their intrinsic goal orientation, task value, use of elaboration learning strategies, critical thinking, and peer learning, when compared to non-PBL instruction [44]. Walker and Leary's [46] meta-analysis of 82 PBL studies and Springer et al's [43] meta-analytical study showed PBL in small groups supported high-need students' success in STEM fields. Gallagher and Gallagher [16] also reported that PBL instruction could surface students who had previously unseen academic potential, meaning the learning strategy not only…”
Section: What To Learnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cooperative learning is proven to be capable of producing various positive effects, for instance less dropouts-especially at the beginning of the studiesbecause it can contribute to students' sense of belonging to colleagues and feeling of security (Seymour & Hewitt, 1997). A meta-study on the effects of cooperative small-group learning on science, mathematics, engineering, and technology students found significant positive effects on achievement, persistence and attitudes (towards subject matter, self esteem and motivation) (Springer, Stanne, & Donovan, 1999). Another metaanalysis on cooperative learning methods showed that students showed higher academic achievements-with respect to grades, quality of products such as reports-than competitive and individualistic efforts (Johnson, Johnson, & Stanne, 2000).…”
Section: Possibilities For Promoting Team Competencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies show that an active classroom environment in which students work in small groups on questions or problems posed by the instructor is effective at promoting learning [6,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. A recent meta-analysis of 225 research studies found that test scores were higher and the number of failures was lower for active learning versus lecture classes [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%