1997
DOI: 10.2307/1370482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Small Forest Openings on the Breeding Bird Community in a Vermont Hardwood Forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
36
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
7
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4). Similar results were obtained by Germaine et al (1997); Hutto and Gallo (2006); Koivula and Schmiegelow (2007). The authors recorded that postdisturbance harvesting negatively affected cavity-nesting birds; however, the effect of windstorm and its management on food resources of birds cannot be excluded.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…4). Similar results were obtained by Germaine et al (1997); Hutto and Gallo (2006); Koivula and Schmiegelow (2007). The authors recorded that postdisturbance harvesting negatively affected cavity-nesting birds; however, the effect of windstorm and its management on food resources of birds cannot be excluded.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Numerous other studies also find that the breeding bird community is largely resilient to various types of harvesting disturbances in tolerant hardwood forests (e.g., Costello et al, 2000;Jobes et al, 2004;Holmes and Pitt, 2007; but see Germaine et al, 1997). The same is true for small-scale natural disturbances, such as small canopy gaps (0.01-1.2 ha) created by ice storms (Faccio, 2003) and hurricanes (Greenberg and Lanham, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Although this data suggests that group selection openings do not have a negative impact on the abundance of forest interior birds, a study in Vermont found somewhat different results. Germaine et al (1997) examined the effects of 0.40 ha group selection cuts on the forest interior bird community and found an increase in abundance of these birds with increasing distance from group selection openings. However, the ratio of openings to forest in his group selection stands (20±36%) was greater than in the present study (10±20%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%