1990
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1990.tb00512.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of simulated acid rain on epicuticular wax production, morphology, chemical composition and on cuticular membrane thickness in two clones of Sitka spruce [Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.]

Abstract: SUMMARY Sticklings (rooted cuttings) of two Sitka spruce [Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.] clones were exposed to simulated rain of 4 pH values (5.6, 4.2, 3.4, 2.6). Rain was applied at 2 mm h−1 for 1 h, three times weekly, for 11 wk starting 1 wk prior to bud break. A range of physicochemical cuticular characteristics were investigated on current‐year needles following 2, 6, and 11 wk of exposure. Cuticular effects were initiated well above the threshold for visible injury (pH 2.6). The magnitude and direction… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
51
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
5
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1), and\or the sequence of class deposition onto the needle surface would be expected to play a role in the degree of biosynthetic response, and overall sensitivity of the cuticle to u.v.-B radiation. This has been clearly shown to be the case for needle wax response to other components of the changing atmospheric environment such as acid rain (Percy & Baker, 1990), acid vapour (Bytnerowicz et al, 1997, tropospheric ozone\acid fog (Percy, Jensen & McQuattie, 1992), or general pollution climate (Turunen et al, 1997 ;Cape & Percy, 1997). Response to changes in plant growth environment such as light quantity\quality (Cape & Percy, 1993) is also known to be influenced by shoot phenology in the four species studied here.…”
Section: mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1), and\or the sequence of class deposition onto the needle surface would be expected to play a role in the degree of biosynthetic response, and overall sensitivity of the cuticle to u.v.-B radiation. This has been clearly shown to be the case for needle wax response to other components of the changing atmospheric environment such as acid rain (Percy & Baker, 1990), acid vapour (Bytnerowicz et al, 1997, tropospheric ozone\acid fog (Percy, Jensen & McQuattie, 1992), or general pollution climate (Turunen et al, 1997 ;Cape & Percy, 1997). Response to changes in plant growth environment such as light quantity\quality (Cape & Percy, 1993) is also known to be influenced by shoot phenology in the four species studied here.…”
Section: mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This might be attributed to the very early development of the epicuticular wax layer in conifer needles (Fig. 1), with considerable proportions in some spruce species already present on expanding primordia before bud break (Percy & Baker, 1990), compared with many crop species that show a more even deposition of waxes during the period of leaf expansion. It might also indicate the dominant genetic influence in the pre-determination of homologue distribution within the wax classes.…”
Section: mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Various hypotheses for the explanation of the phenomenon may be put forward: (1) inorganic gases not covered in this study (e.g. NjO or NO) or mixtures of air pollutants might react directly with nonacosan-10-ol (Huttunen & Laine, 1981;Cape, 1983); (2) direct reactions might be accelerated in the presence of water (Percy & Baker, 1990;Turunen & Huttunen, 1991); (3) nonacosan-10-ol might be sensitive to intermediates formed in reactions of inorganic air pollutants either with plant products like diterpenoids (Elstner, Osswald & Youngman, 1985) or with airborne organic xenobiotics like polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (Aceves & Grimalt, 1993); (4) tubules might be destroyed or even eroded by the mechanical impact of dust or precipitation (Baker & Hunt, 1986;Gunthardt-Goerg, 1991). These hypotheses, which imply the direct action of atmospheric conditions on epicuticular crystals, have not yet been tested experimentally.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these studies have in common that a more or less evident alteration of ,^^^ surface wax aggregates can be observed by scanning electron microscopy (Huttunen & Laine, 1983 ;Barnes, Davison & Booth, 1988;Bermadinger, Grill & Golob, 1988;Adams, Capron & Hutchinson, 1990;Percy & Baker, 1990). As a consequetice, leaf surface wettability increased as measured by the means of contact angle determination (Cape, 1983;Percy, Jensen & McQuattie, 1992).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%