2018
DOI: 10.17221/19/2018-jfs
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) on the humus forms in Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) H. Karst.) stands

Abstract: Podrázský V., Vacek Z., Kupka I., Vacek S., Třeštík M., Cukor J. (2018): Effects of silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) on the humus forms in Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) H. Karst.) stands. J. For. Sci., 64: 245-250.The effects of silver fir (Abies alba Miller) on the soil compared to Norway spruce (Picea abies (Linnaeus) H. Karsten) were evaluated. Altitude of the study site is 790 m a.s.l., mild slope of 10° facing SW, forest site is spruce-beech on acid soil. The forest floor and top soil horizons (L + F1, F2 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bioavailable calcium did not show clear differences between natural stands and spruce plantations. Similar results were also reported by Podrázsky et al (2018), who examined the differences between common fir stands and spruce plantations. A statistically higher share of calcium in the surface soil layer in natural stands was found at the sites Sošice and Ivanec, higher share at the sites Bosiljevo and Medvednica, while at all other sites, the ratio was higher in the spruce plantation (Tab.…”
Section: Iforest -Biogeosciences and Forestrysupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The bioavailable calcium did not show clear differences between natural stands and spruce plantations. Similar results were also reported by Podrázsky et al (2018), who examined the differences between common fir stands and spruce plantations. A statistically higher share of calcium in the surface soil layer in natural stands was found at the sites Sošice and Ivanec, higher share at the sites Bosiljevo and Medvednica, while at all other sites, the ratio was higher in the spruce plantation (Tab.…”
Section: Iforest -Biogeosciences and Forestrysupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Also, nutritional imbalances may accelerate the decline and death of climatically stressed trees (Hevia et al 2019;Gonzáles de Andrés et al 2022). Silver fir shows humus forms with lower surface humus accumulation, but with soil chemistry very comparable with that of Norway spruce (Podrázský et al 2018). The importance of impaired nutrition may increase in the future, as the concentration of nutrients in foliage is decreasing in the long term on a European scale (Jonard et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…More detailed information about the silver https://doi.org/10.17221/162/2022-JFS fir in the Czech Republic can be found in Novák and Dušek (2021). Increasing the share of fir in forest stands is desirable for several reasons: (i) silver fir is an ecological and functional tree species, which stabilises soil and retains water; (ii) it is less vulnerable to wind and snow or ice breakage than Norway spruce; (iii) it is a very important tree species for maintaining high biodiversity in forest ecosystems; (iv) fir has wide plasticity to environmental conditions and the ability to coexist with many tree species in mixtures due to its ability to survive long periods in the understorey and to respond when light conditions become more favourable; and (v) silver fir is also an economically important tree species (Schütz 2002;Tinner et al 2013;Mauri et al 2016;Dobrowolska et al 2017;Podrázský et al 2018;Schwarz, Bauhus 2019;Walder et al 2021). This explains the increased interest in silver fir and its ecological requirements as well as the possibility of increasing its share in forest stands.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%