2020
DOI: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_423_19
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of short inter-pregnancy interval on maternal and perinatal outcomes: A cohort study of pregnant women in a low-income country

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies also indicate that although women’s iron levels typically recover 4–6 weeks after delivery, women from low socioeconomic backgrounds require substantially longer periods to replenish their stores 15. This deficiency is further exacerbated due to HRFB, such as smaller than recommended interpregnancy intervals and longer duration of breast feeding 29. This is worsened when adolescents reach pregnancy with low nutritional reserves 27.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies also indicate that although women’s iron levels typically recover 4–6 weeks after delivery, women from low socioeconomic backgrounds require substantially longer periods to replenish their stores 15. This deficiency is further exacerbated due to HRFB, such as smaller than recommended interpregnancy intervals and longer duration of breast feeding 29. This is worsened when adolescents reach pregnancy with low nutritional reserves 27.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having an inter-pregnancy interval of <18 months was found to contribute to anemia. A short inter-pregnancy interval is said to hinder the restoration of the depleted maternal resources that are needed for the subsequent pregnancy and pose the risk of anemia, pregnancy-induced hypertension, premature rapture of the membranes, and others [40] Several observational studies have confirmed the association between the short inter-pregnancy interval and anemia. [40][41][42] Moreover, this study found that about 41.7% of pregnant women had a short inter-pregnancy interval.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A short inter-pregnancy interval is said to hinder the restoration of the depleted maternal resources that are needed for the subsequent pregnancy and pose the risk of anemia, pregnancy-induced hypertension, premature rapture of the membranes, and others [40] Several observational studies have confirmed the association between the short inter-pregnancy interval and anemia. [40][41][42] Moreover, this study found that about 41.7% of pregnant women had a short inter-pregnancy interval. This raises concerns about family planning use among women of reproductive age in this setting, owing to the potential effect of a short inter-pregnancy interval on anemia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e choice of an 18-month cutoff to define a short IPI in this analysis was based on the indicator used in Healthy People 2020 [13]. While some authorities suggest that IPI less than 18 months was associated with increased risk, it is important to note that even within this 18-month window, the level of risk decreases as interval length increases [13,[24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is paucity of data on the relationship between IPI and the risk of placenta previa and placenta accreta spectrum disorder in low-income settings where there are high aversions for cesarean section [ 8 , 12 , 13 ]. It is worthwhile to note that the majority of previous studies were conducted in the western populations [ 3 , 11 , 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%