2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2016.09.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of shade, altitude and management on multiple ecosystem services in coffee agroecosystems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
76
0
23

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
5
76
0
23
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, in our study region, Cerda et al. () found that diversified coffee agroforestry systems maintain higher soil potassium content than either simple coffee agroforestry systems (e.g. one shade‐tree species only) and coffee monocultures, and some of these shade trees are leguminous species, contributing to soil fertility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For instance, in our study region, Cerda et al. () found that diversified coffee agroforestry systems maintain higher soil potassium content than either simple coffee agroforestry systems (e.g. one shade‐tree species only) and coffee monocultures, and some of these shade trees are leguminous species, contributing to soil fertility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Such lowinput agricultural systems are repeatedly linked with higher diversity (Tscharntke et al, 2005), given that species interactions often replace external inputs. For instance, in our study region, Cerda et al (2017) found that diversified coffee agroforestry systems maintain higher soil potassium content than either simple coffee agroforestry systems (e.g. one shade-tree species only) and coffee monocultures, and some of these shade trees are leguminous species, contributing to soil fertility.…”
Section: The Role Of Plant Characteristics In Management Actionsmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A wide range of adaptation options have been proposed for helping farmers adapt to climate change. These include planting new crop varieties that are heat tolerant, drought resistant, or less susceptible to pests and diseases [38,39], increasing fertilizer and pesticide use [52], improving water management through irrigation and water harvesting [39,47], changing farm management practices such as changes in planting dates or crop rotations [46], adopting soil conservation practices such as live barriers, cover crops, and terracing [64,68], diversifying crop production and household income sources [49,62,69], and restoring degraded areas and risk-prone sites [38], among others. All of these options merit inclusion in adaptation strategies.…”
Section: Conclusion and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these practices are considered 'Ecosystem-based Adaptation' (i.e., adaptation practices that are based on the conservation, restoration, and sustainable management of biodiversity and ecosystem services [56]) and are known to improve the longterm resiliency of smallholder farming systems [57]. For example, the incorporation of trees as shade is known to buffer extreme temperatures within fields [21,58], mitigate the impacts of extreme weather events [59,60], and ensure the provision of ecosystem services [61,62] and can therefore help enhance adaptation of farming systems. Farmers in Chiapas, Mexico, for example, planted more shade trees in their coffee plots as a response to Hurricane Stan [26].…”
Section: (244)mentioning
confidence: 99%