2017
DOI: 10.1177/0145561317096010-1123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Septoplasty on Olfactory Function Evaluated by the Brief Smell Identification Test: A Study of 116 Patients

Abstract: We conducted a prospective study of 116 patients-61 men and 55 women, aged 17 to 64 years (mean: 26.4)to investigate the effects of septoplasty on olfactory function in patients with septal deviation (SD). The Mladina classification system was used to define SD types, and olfactory function was assessed with the Brief Smell Identification test (BSIT). The BSIT, which includes 12 odorants, was administered preoperatively and at postoperative months 1 and 3. The most common SD types were types 2 (20.7% of patien… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[7][8][9][10] To date, there are a few studies evaluating the effects of septal surgery on olfactory function. 1,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] However, the impact of olfactory impairment due to septal deviation on the nasal-symptom related and general QoL of the patients has not been adequately addressed in the literature. In addition, although there are studies investigating predictive factors for QoL outcomes after septoplasty, [19][20][21][22][23][24][25] there is no data available to the relevance of the olfactory function specifically to patients' psychological status (anxiety and depression symptoms) and its effect on their satisfaction with the surgical procedure and postoperative QoL recovery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9][10] To date, there are a few studies evaluating the effects of septal surgery on olfactory function. 1,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] However, the impact of olfactory impairment due to septal deviation on the nasal-symptom related and general QoL of the patients has not been adequately addressed in the literature. In addition, although there are studies investigating predictive factors for QoL outcomes after septoplasty, [19][20][21][22][23][24][25] there is no data available to the relevance of the olfactory function specifically to patients' psychological status (anxiety and depression symptoms) and its effect on their satisfaction with the surgical procedure and postoperative QoL recovery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Berkiten et al (13) , 2016 SP CCCRC 6 w Mean score of 3.81 (0.89) Statistically significant improvement Dalgic et al (14) , 2016 Miyake et al (16) , 2016 Randhawa et al (17) , 2016 SRP SST (OD) 12 w NR Significant change in SST score. 58% improved, 35% remained the same, 7% worsened Haytoglu et al (18) , 2017 Turk et al (19) , 2017 SP SST (OT, OD, OI) 6 w 33.3% of patients were normosmic, 60.0% hyposmic, and 6.7% anosmic Significant improvement in SST scores. 63.3% of patients were normosmic, 36.7% hyposmic, and none anosmic 6 w after surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…STATA® 16.0 (StataCorp., College Station, TX, USA) software was used for the meta-analysis. The difference in means in olfactory function was calculated for 2 studies reporting BSIT scores (12,18) , 4 reporting CCCRC scores (6,13,15,20) , 4 reporting all three subsets of the Sniffin' Sticks test (4,5,14,21) and 2 reporting SST OI scores (10,11) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The difference between our study and Fu et al's study 34 may be related to the degree of the nasal obstruction. Complete nasal obstruction or more anteriorly located nasal SD near to the nasal valve (ie, Mladina type 2 nasal SD) 35 may reduce the transfer of the nasal odorants to the olfactory epithelium; and OB volume decrease may be more prominent in these patients. One of the limitations of our study is that we did not evaluate the classification of the nasal SD as complete obstruction or not; and in the future, we will plan to evaluate the nasal obstruction degree and investigate the OB volume and OS depth in these patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%