1967
DOI: 10.1097/00000658-196704000-00006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects Of Septic Shock On Renal Function In Humans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A study of renal function in septic shock carried out at the University of Maryland School of Medicine, for example, showed generally higher serial specific gravity measurements among nonsurvivors than among survivors despite the fact that other studies POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE indicated an almost complete loss of renal concentrating ability in the patients who subsequently died. 13 It follows that measure_ment of urinary osmolality (affected only bynumbers of particles) is a much more reliable guide to concentrating capacity of the kidneys in shock patients.…”
Section: Renal Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study of renal function in septic shock carried out at the University of Maryland School of Medicine, for example, showed generally higher serial specific gravity measurements among nonsurvivors than among survivors despite the fact that other studies POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE indicated an almost complete loss of renal concentrating ability in the patients who subsequently died. 13 It follows that measure_ment of urinary osmolality (affected only bynumbers of particles) is a much more reliable guide to concentrating capacity of the kidneys in shock patients.…”
Section: Renal Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of septicwmia on renal blood flow have also been studied in 10 patients, 7 of whom had Gram-negative septiceemia, and 3 had staphylococcal septicemia (Strauch et al 1967). All showed considerable reduction of renal blood flow and renal function and patients in whom renal blood flow fell to below 10% of the normal expected values did not survive.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%