2012
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.5687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of seeding rate, nitrogen rate and cultivar on barley malt quality

Abstract: Higher seeding rates reduced kernel size and grain protein levels without compromising malt extract owing to better endosperm modification of the more uniformly sized kernels. Negative effects of higher nitrogen rates on malt quality can be reduced through development of cultivars with improved ability to modify protein during malting.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
30
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
7
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Brewing technology itself contributes also to the final β-glucan content in wort. Edney et al (2012Edney et al ( , 2014 reported wort β-glucan content ranging from 60 to 140 mg/L for Canadian barley varieties. Even though there are no recommendations for brewers regarding total β-glucan content in malt, for wort it is recommended it should not exceed 200 mg/L (Davis 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brewing technology itself contributes also to the final β-glucan content in wort. Edney et al (2012Edney et al ( , 2014 reported wort β-glucan content ranging from 60 to 140 mg/L for Canadian barley varieties. Even though there are no recommendations for brewers regarding total β-glucan content in malt, for wort it is recommended it should not exceed 200 mg/L (Davis 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low levels were partly explained by the tendency for Canadian barley to have higher levels of grain protein than European barley, a factor that restricts friability. However, friability became a breeding target and eventually CDC Copeland was released, a cultivar with consistently improved friability levels, which could also be related to protein modification (Edney et al 2012). CDC Copeland was released in 1999.…”
Section: Refining Malt Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of barley and malt needs to be consistent among batches and homogeneous within batches. Data on the homogeneity of barley kernel size, as determined with the Single Kernel Characterization System, have shown that homogeneity is related to malt quality (Edney et al 2012). The quality evaluation system is currently considering the merits of including barley homogeneity as a criterion when evaluating cultivars for registration.…”
Section: Future Directions For Quality Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil acidity adversely affects morphological, physiological, and biochemical processes in plants and thus N uptake and use efficiency (Fageria & Baligar 2005;Marschner 2011). Negative effects of high N fertilizer rates on malting barley kernel characteristics and malt quality have been reported by several researchers (Bertholdsson 1999;Petterson 2006;O'Donovan et al 2011;Edney et al 2012). The frequency of rejection of malting barley owing to high grain N content by malt factories in Ethiopia is low compared to other quality parameters, such as kernel size, moisture content, and so on, as the N rate applied by producers is low.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To maximize yield and quality of malting barley, it has been shown that N management practices should be adjusted according to anticipated availability of water and N in the soil (McKenzie et al 2005) and the needs of particular cultivars (Bertholdsson 1999;Petterson 2006;Edney et al 2012). Diversification of crops in cropping systems improves production efficiencies and resilience of agricultural systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%