2012
DOI: 10.1111/jace.12120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Tm3+ Additions on the Crystallization of LaF3 Nanocrystals in Oxyfluoride Glasses: Optical Characterization and Up‐Conversion

Abstract: The influence of the addition of 1 mol% Tm2O3 on the nanocrystallization of LaF3 in a glass of composition 55SiO2–20Al2O3–15Na2O–10LaF3 (mol%) has been studied. Tm2O3 affects the phase separation in the glass and delays the onset of crystallization with respect to the undoped glass. Additionally, the maximum LaF3 crystal size is slightly greater than that in the undoped glass–ceramics. The microstructural and compositional changes in the glass matrix have been studied using several techniques, including viscos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
47
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(106 reference statements)
6
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2, crystallization activation energies were calculated and their values are (329 ± 16) kJ/mol and (342 ± 18) kJ/mol for 0.1-0.5 Pr-Yb and 0.5-1 Pr-Yb, respectively. These results are similar to those obtained for the un-doped (de Pablos-Martín et al, 2011) and Tm 3+ doped glass (de Pablos-Martín et al, 2013), Avrami n parameter was calculated, using Eq. 1, from the slope of each line; a n mean value was obtained from the slope of the five lines represented in Figures 2A,B for 0.1-0.5 Pr-Yb and 0.5-1 Pr-Yb, respectively.…”
Section: Dta and Crystallization Mechanismsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…2, crystallization activation energies were calculated and their values are (329 ± 16) kJ/mol and (342 ± 18) kJ/mol for 0.1-0.5 Pr-Yb and 0.5-1 Pr-Yb, respectively. These results are similar to those obtained for the un-doped (de Pablos-Martín et al, 2011) and Tm 3+ doped glass (de Pablos-Martín et al, 2013), Avrami n parameter was calculated, using Eq. 1, from the slope of each line; a n mean value was obtained from the slope of the five lines represented in Figures 2A,B for 0.1-0.5 Pr-Yb and 0.5-1 Pr-Yb, respectively.…”
Section: Dta and Crystallization Mechanismsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This means that the use of Kissinger equation is valid for the calculation of the crystallization activation energy and corresponds to a volumetric crystallization with crystal growth controlled by diffusion (Donald, 2004). The same (n, m) parameters were also obtained for the un-doped glass and for Tm 3+ doped glass (de Pablos- Martín et al, 2013), confirming that dopants do not affect the crystallization mechanism but may affect the crystallization kinetics and influence LaF3 crystals size.…”
Section: Dta and Crystallization Mechanismsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…After heat treatment, local symmetry around the optically active dopant (Eu 3? ions) and participation of ionic bonds increased [20]. The value of R is decreased due to incorporation of RE 3?…”
Section: Excitation and Luminescence Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 91%