1998
DOI: 10.1680/geot.1998.48.6.847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of sampler design on tube sampling disturbance—numerical and analytical investigations

Abstract: The detailed features of the design of a sampling tube, such as area ratio, inside clearance, cutting edge taper angle, etc., have an important influence on the disturbance caused when a tube sampler is pushed into cohesive soil. Currently, most tube sampler designs have evolved on the basis of empirical design rules, and local good practices, developed for particular soil conditions. The strain path method provides a basis upon which the influence and importance of different features of tube sampler design ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As discussed by Clayton et al (1998), numerous researchers have investigated the extent and nature of disturbance during sampling and laboratory testing (Skempton and Sowa, 1963 Lau, 1988; Clayton et al, 1992). However, most of this research has been focused on comparative experimental investigations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As discussed by Clayton et al (1998), numerous researchers have investigated the extent and nature of disturbance during sampling and laboratory testing (Skempton and Sowa, 1963 Lau, 1988; Clayton et al, 1992). However, most of this research has been focused on comparative experimental investigations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method was further extended by Clayton et al (1998) to examine the eŠects of diŠerent details of sampling tube geometry, including outside cutting edge angle (OCA), inside cutting edge angle (ICA), inside clearance ratio (ICR) and area ratio (AR), as deˆned in Fig. 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three deformation stages were identified for soil located at the centreline of the sampler: (a) compression, ahead of the sampler, (b) extension, near to the cutting edge, and (c) compression, inside the sampler. Clayton et al [8] complemented the work done by Baligh and co-workers by considering more realistic geometries for the cutting edge of the sampler. The results were analyzed in terms of the geometric descriptors introduced by Hvorslev [27] to quantify the effects of tube sampling caused by different tools.…”
Section: Block Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ladd and Lambe 1963;Baligh 1985;Baligh et al 1987;Hight et al 1992;Tanaka et al 1996;Lunne et al 1997;Clayton et al 1998;Hight 2001;Ladd and DeGroot 2003). This modifies the mechanical characteristics of the soil and leads to the specification of different, and in general more conservative, material parameters (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%