Effects of Rural Electrification on Employment: A Comment on Dinkelman (2011)

Abstract

This paper replicates and extends the seminal paper by Dinkelman (2011) on the impacts of electrification on female employment. We revisit the validity of the identification strategy that uses the land gradient as an instrumental variable (IV). Our robustness checks cast doubt on the exclusion restriction as the IV drives the outcome variable in non-electrified regions. We also demonstrate that it is more difficult to disentangle the effects of electricity and road infrastructure than the original paper claims, because the IV affects both. We additionally highlight that the IV is weak, consequently preventing interpretation of the point estimates that are used throughout the original paper. The concomitance of a questionable exclusion restriction and a weak IV is particularly problematic. We conclude by arguing that the take-aways of the original paper for policy and the academic literature need to be reconsidered. In general terms, our comment shows the difficulties of using geographical variation as a natural experiment for infrastructure evaluation.

The elusive quest for sustainable off-grid electrification: new evidence from Indonesia

“…A major findings from this evaluation, the low electricity demand and the absence of considerable productive uses, are also aligned with much of the recent impact evaluation literature on on-grid extension into previously unserved rural areas in Burkina Faso, Kenya, Rwanda, and Tanzania (see Bensch et al 2019;Chaplin et al 2017;Lenz et al 2018;Lee et al 2020, Moradi and Schmidt 2022, Taneja 2018. The take-away for future off-grid and mini-grid programs is that project designs and accompanying business models should be scrutinized more critically, especially with regards to assumptions about demand and prospects for commercial activities.…”

Evaluating the Impacts of Minigrid Electrification in Sub-Saharan Africa

“…In fact, most empirical studies find mixed results and generally weak structural economic impacts (Bayer et al, 2020). In the case of a set of seminal research papers providing evidence of significant employment or development effects of electrification, serious methodological concerns have recently been highlighted, casting doubt on the reliability of those results (Bensch et al, 2020b(Bensch et al, , 2021. As discussed in Bayer et al (2020), impact evaluations from observational studies tend to over-promise positive impacts and lack the external validity of the results.…”

South Africa's Energy Landscape Amidst the Crisis: Unpacking Energy Sources and Drivers with 2022 Statistics South Africa Census Data

“…Savacool (2014) asserts that deprivation of energy access often leads to morbidity, political instability and even environmental degradation. Dinkelman (2011) and Bensch et al, (2020) studied the effect of rural electrification on employment in South Africa and concluded that electricity access increased hours of work for both male and female, reduced female wages and raised male earnings.…”