Effects of Running Velocity on Running Kinetics and Kinematics

Brughelli, Matt; Cronin, John; Chaouachi, Anis

doi:10.1519/jsc.0b013e3181c64308

Cited by 136 publications

(111 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…were in good overall agreement with previous studies [23][24][25][26][27]. Furthermore, the difference in these variables between Clusters 1 and 3 were in agreement with studies comparing MFS / FFS and RFS runners [5,9].…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 91%

The effect of running velocity on footstrike angle – A curve-clustering approach

Forrester

Townend

2015

Gait & Posture

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Citation: FORRESTER, S.E. and TOWNEND, J., 2015. The effect of running velocity on footstrike angle -a curve-clustering approach. Gait and Posture, 41 (1), pp. 26 -32.Additional Information:• NOTICE: this is the author's version of a work that was accepted for publication in Gait and Posture. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Gait -1 -

show abstract

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 91%

The effect of running velocity on footstrike angle – A curve-clustering approach

Forrester

Townend

2015

Gait & Posture

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Recent research has shown high levels of horizontal force application is related to faster sprinting speeds. [11][12][13][14][15] Contreras and colleagues 16 found that the hip thrust is effective for improving both horizontal jump distance and sprinting performance.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of 6-week squat, deadlift, or hip thrust training program on speed, power, agility, and strength in experienced lifters: A pilot study

Zweifel¹,

Vigotsky²,

Contreras³

et al. 2017

Journal of Trainology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives:To compare the ergogenic effects of back squats, deadlifts, and hip thrusts. Design: Pilot randomized-controlled trial Methods: In order to determine the feasibility of such a large training study, a pilot study was carried out with 26 male and female participants (age = 22.15 ± 2.2 years; height = 180.17 ± 8.37 cm; body mass = 87.27 ± 15.72 kg). Subjects performed squats (n = 8), hip thrusts (n = 8), deadlifts (n = 6), or nothing (control) (n = 4) for three training sessions a week, for six weeks; thereafter, measures of sprinting performance, vertical jump, broad jump, strength, and change of direction were compared to baseline.Results: This pilot study was carried out successfully. Effect-sizes, medians, and interquartile ranges for all possible comparisons have been presented for power analyses. Conclusion:Although all of the studied interventions show promise, larger investigations are necessary in order to draw more definitive, applicable conclusions.(Journal of Trainology 2017;6:13-17)

show abstract

“…[23] and resisted sprinting [28] whereby velocity and stride length increase and joint range of motion may decrease with increased distance.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Biomechanical Analysis of the Heavy Sprint-Style Sled Pull and Comparison with the Back Squat

Winwood

Cronin

Brown

et al. 2015

International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

. A biomechanical analysis of the heavy sprint-style sled pull and comparison with the back squat. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1260/1747-9541.10. ABSTRACTThis study compared the biomechanical characteristics of the heavy sprint-style sled pull and squat. Six experienced male strongman athletes performed sled pulls and squats at 70% of their 1RM squat. Significant kinematic and kinetic differences were observed between the sled pull start and squat at the start of the concentric phase and at maximum knee extension.The first stride of the heavy sled pull demonstrated significantly (p<0.05) lower stride lengths and average velocities and a higher mean ratio of force than the stride at 2 -3 m. The force orientation and magnitude associated with the heavy sprint-style sled pull demonstrates that the heavy sled pull may be an effective conditioning stimulus to generate superior anteriorpropulsive forces compared to vertically orientated exercises such as the squat with the same given load. Such adaptations may be beneficial in sports where higher levels of sprint momentum are needed to make and break tackles.

show abstract

Effects of Running Velocity on Running Kinetics and Kinematics

Cited by 136 publications

References 23 publications

The effect of running velocity on footstrike angle – A curve-clustering approach

The effect of running velocity on footstrike angle – A curve-clustering approach

Effects of 6-week squat, deadlift, or hip thrust training program on speed, power, agility, and strength in experienced lifters: A pilot study

A Biomechanical Analysis of the Heavy Sprint-Style Sled Pull and Comparison with the Back Squat

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About