2015
DOI: 10.18869/acadpub.jnms.2.4.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of roy's adaptation model in nursing practice on the quality of life in patients with type II diabetes

Abstract: Background and Purpose: Diabetes has adverse effects on the quality of life of patients. Roy's adaptation model could be used to enhance quality of life among diabetic patients. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of Roy's adaptation model in nursing practice on the quality of life in patients with type II diabetes.Methods: This quasi-experimental study was conducted on 60 diabetic patients randomly divided into two groups of experiment and control (N=30) at Hamadan Diabetes Research Center. Data were col… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In total, 20 studies compared NTGP with routine/traditional nursing practice . A total of 14 studies compared NTGP with no intervention on the control or comparison group , and only one study did not involve any comparison group .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In total, 20 studies compared NTGP with routine/traditional nursing practice . A total of 14 studies compared NTGP with no intervention on the control or comparison group , and only one study did not involve any comparison group .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of 35 studies, the quality rating was judged to be strong for three studies , moderate for 24 studies and weak for seven studies . The major limitation of most of the weakly rated studies was the groups were somewhat noncomparable at the baseline, indicating the chances of selection bias and the chances that the outcomes could have been due to other variables which were not accounted for during baseline comparison.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%