Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2018
DOI: 10.5713/ajas.17.0323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of roughage quality, period of day and time lapse after meal termination on rumen digesta load in goats and sheep

Abstract: ObjectiveThis study ascertained effects of roughage quality, period of day at meal termination and time lapse after feeding on digesta load in the rumen.MethodsVeld hay was untreated (poor roughage quality, PRQ), improved (improved roughage quality, IRQ) by treating with urea or semi-improved by spraying with urea (semi-improved roughage quality, SIRQ). Experiment 1a used four rumen fistulated sheep to determine in-sacco degradability. Twelve sheep (56.3±4.59 kg) were blocked by weight and randomly allocated t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, correlation results suggest that rumination time is a positive function of intake (Table 9) and is likely to increase with rumen ‘fill’ which is higher in animals after prolonged adaptation to roughage diets [32]. Observed rumen fill levels (kg fibre/100 kg weight) of greater than 2.2 were seen in goats [33] when 1.7 is expected for temperate ruminants [34]. A value greater than 1.7 should be applied to ruminants fed on tropical roughages in Africa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, correlation results suggest that rumination time is a positive function of intake (Table 9) and is likely to increase with rumen ‘fill’ which is higher in animals after prolonged adaptation to roughage diets [32]. Observed rumen fill levels (kg fibre/100 kg weight) of greater than 2.2 were seen in goats [33] when 1.7 is expected for temperate ruminants [34]. A value greater than 1.7 should be applied to ruminants fed on tropical roughages in Africa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may have caused a high passage rate of the digesta through the gastrointestinal tract and a shorter retention time of the bolus resulting in the highest intake (Conte et al, 2018). NDF has a slow digestibility rate compared to soluble nutrients, such as CP and NFC, because it is not readily available to ruminal microorganisms and needs to be colonized by them to be degraded in the rumen (Moyo et al, 2018). The increase in the rate of passage is caused by the increased flow pressure caused by the ingestion of more feed on the digesta present in the gastrointestinal tract (Van Soest 1994).…”
Section: Nutrient Digestibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tannins tend to also bind RDP and fibre which disadvantages rumen nutrient digestibility. Milk performance is a function of nutrient intake as influenced by diet digestibility ( Moyo et al., 2018 ; Mutimura et al., 2018 ). Milk parameters can benefit from the use of dietary tannins but their adoption is disadvantaged by conflicting nutrient intake and digestibility response to dietary tannins ( Matra & Wanapat, 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%