2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejop.2015.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of rotifers, copepods and chironomid larvae on microbial communities in peatlands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of experimental studies confirm this hypothesis. A study by Mieczan et al, (2015b) shows that crustaceans can consume smaller testate amoeba taxa in peatbogs dominated by Sphagnum, while a study by Reiss and Schmid-Aaya (2011) showed that crustacean predation in combination with predation by other groups of meiofauna can significantly reduce ciliate abundance. At the same time, testate amoeba and ciliates may consume different species of protozoa (Reiss and Schmid-Aaya, 2011).…”
Section: Trophic Structure Of the Food Web-isotopic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of experimental studies confirm this hypothesis. A study by Mieczan et al, (2015b) shows that crustaceans can consume smaller testate amoeba taxa in peatbogs dominated by Sphagnum, while a study by Reiss and Schmid-Aaya (2011) showed that crustacean predation in combination with predation by other groups of meiofauna can significantly reduce ciliate abundance. At the same time, testate amoeba and ciliates may consume different species of protozoa (Reiss and Schmid-Aaya, 2011).…”
Section: Trophic Structure Of the Food Web-isotopic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, thus far no studies have been carried out on seasonal variation in stable isotopes in individual elements of the food web in peatbog ecosystems. However, given the considerable dynamics of changes in the qualitative and quantitative structure of microorganisms, rotifers and crustaceans in peatbog ecosystems (Mieczan, ; Marcisz et al, ; Mieczan et al, ), it seems that similar variation should be expected in the flow of energy through the microbiological food web to higher trophic levels. Therefore, in this study we analysed trophic relationships from the producer level to the consumer level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is especially the case in ombrotrophic peatlands, where cryptogams such as Sphagnum mosses can dominate the ecosystem (Yu et al, 2011). Sphagnum mosses form expansive carpets that provide a habitat for a large diversity of microbial communities (Gilbert et al, 1998; Jassey et al, 2013, 2015; Bragina et al, 2014; Mieczan et al, 2015a, b). The Sphagnum microbiome is structured in a microbial food web constituted by bacteria, fungi (decomposers), protists (producers, predators, top-predators), and small-sized metazoan (predators, top-predators).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in the abundance of individual ciliate taxa may also have resulted from trophic interactions within this group of organisms; a study by Jürgens et al (1999) showed that the abundance of small ciliate species, such as Halteria, may be successfully controlled by large predatory species. Mieczan et al (2015) also showed that large predatory or omnivorous ciliates (Paradileptus elephantinus) may control the abundance of small-sized taxa. At the same time, a significant increase was noted in mixotrophic taxa, mainly Paramecium bursaria, in acidic peat pools in the temperate climate zone and in lowfertility pools in the polar climate zone.…”
Section: Functional Groups Of Ciliatesmentioning
confidence: 99%