2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1352-2310(02)00157-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of room furnishings and air speed on particle deposition rates indoors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
290
2
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 341 publications
(309 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
15
290
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the used deposition velocity was a combination of measurements and theoretical assumption from studies (Xu et al 1994, Thatcher et al 2002, Lai and Nazaroff 2000. The penetration factor was also calculated with other deposition velocities measured in similar chambers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this study, the used deposition velocity was a combination of measurements and theoretical assumption from studies (Xu et al 1994, Thatcher et al 2002, Lai and Nazaroff 2000. The penetration factor was also calculated with other deposition velocities measured in similar chambers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, there is considerable uncertainty in the typical values of deposition velocities for buildings. In this study the deposition velocity used was adapted from results reported in Xu et al (1994), Thatcher et al (2002), and is extrapolated with theoretical predictions of Lai and Nazaroff (2000), the same deposition velocity is used also in Fisk et al (2002). Deposition velocity, Equation (4), used here is based on a combination of measured data from full size rooms and extrapolations consistent with theoretical predictions, and it is valid for particle diameters between 0.3 -8 µm, Figure 2. ( ) 6 58 .…”
Section: Penetration Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although particle deposition onto indoor surfaces have been studied extensively (Offermann et al 1985;Thatcher et al 2002;Thatcher et al 2003;Vette et al 2001), there are limited relevant experimental data (Ott et al 2007) or theoretical models to provide the exact value of deposition coefficient inside vehicles. Airflow speed and surface area are two main factors determining the deposition coefficient (Thatcher et al 2002), and these factors are quite different between the in-cabin and the indoor microenvironments. In-cabin air exchange rates, 1.9-48.5 h −1 (Ott et al 2007), are much greater than those found in typical indoor environments which are usually on the order of 0.5 h −1 (Murray and Burmaster 1995).…”
Section: Deposition Coefficient (␤)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This increased decay rate of particles in the chamber could have been caused by several factors, including underestimation of particle size by the APS, electro- static deposition in the chamber, or impaction on fan or other surfaces (Thatcher et al 2002). The latter two loss mechanisms were reduced to the extent possible.…”
Section: Aerosol Particle Size and Concentration Decaymentioning
confidence: 99%