2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0031-9384(01)00509-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of room and cage familiarity on locomotor activity measures in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Infants generally rear and groom more than adults in the familiar environment, results consistent with a prior study showing that 3-week-old rats engage in both behaviors more than adults do (Campbell & Mabry, 1973). We recommend careful baseline comparison analysis when using a novel test chamber for infants and comparing the outcomes to adult responses.Consistent with the literature, our data also confirm that adults were most active in the novel environment compared with the familiar environment (Buelke-Sam et al, 1984;Galani et al, 2001), but our data further demonstrate this is only true in the dark phase. Direct comparison of familiar with novel responses are rare in open-field studies.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Infants generally rear and groom more than adults in the familiar environment, results consistent with a prior study showing that 3-week-old rats engage in both behaviors more than adults do (Campbell & Mabry, 1973). We recommend careful baseline comparison analysis when using a novel test chamber for infants and comparing the outcomes to adult responses.Consistent with the literature, our data also confirm that adults were most active in the novel environment compared with the familiar environment (Buelke-Sam et al, 1984;Galani et al, 2001), but our data further demonstrate this is only true in the dark phase. Direct comparison of familiar with novel responses are rare in open-field studies.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…Environmental novelty or familiarity significantly influences adult activity (Buelke-Sam, Sullivan, Kimmel, & Nelson, 1984;Galani, Duconseille, Bildstein, & Cassel, 2001), and some infant studies have a limited consideration of this (Buelke-Sam et al, 1984;Eilam & Golani, 1988;Golani et al, 2005;Pappas, Vickers, Buxton, & Pusztay, 1982). Open questions on late infant patterns of exploration remain.…”
Section: Nih-pa Author Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to different substrains of mice used in these studies, our behavioral tests were performed in the home cages as opposed to a habituated testing environment described in Miner studies (1997). The novelty of the testing environment is known for influencing the basal (Galani et al, 2001) and drug-stimulated locomotor activity (Carey et al, 2005) in rodents. Furthermore, it has been reported that habituation to a novel environment in rodents is determined by specific genes (for review see Leussis and Bolivar, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, this finding suggests that the essential change in exploratory pattern caused by subordination is a decline in activity, given the decreased number of crossings in the peripheral area, rather than a decrease in active patterns of exploratory behavior. Since the peripheral area of the open field used in the present experiment was a mildly phobic place from which they could not escape, rats stayed with crouching posture in the corners of the peripheral area accompanied by an increasing withdrawal tendency as a response to a novel environment (see also Blanchard et al, 1991;Galani, Duconseille, Bildstein, & Cassel, 2001). Thus, the decrease in the amount of locomotion in this inescapable area should be considered to reflect not only decreased activity but also an increased tendency towards crouch/ freeze, which represents the withdrawal pattern of defensive behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%