2021
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10214908
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Robotic-Assisted Gait Training in Children and Adolescents with Cerebral Palsy: A Network Meta-Analysis

Abstract: Gait disturbances are common in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy (CP). Robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT) is becoming increasingly widespread, and hence it is important to examine its effectiveness. A network meta-analysis (NMA) of clinical trials comparing treatments with RAGT vs. other physical therapy treatments was carried out. This study was conducted according to the NMA version of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA-NMA) guidelines and following … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(116 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In children with CP, reviews and meta-analyses have not found signi cant differences in the use of the walking robot compared to other physiotherapy treatments aimed at rehabilitating walking function (22,28,29). In a recent meta-analysis that included 8 clinical trials (2 nonrandomized), no signi cant differences were found compared to physical therapy treatments (22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In children with CP, reviews and meta-analyses have not found signi cant differences in the use of the walking robot compared to other physiotherapy treatments aimed at rehabilitating walking function (22,28,29). In a recent meta-analysis that included 8 clinical trials (2 nonrandomized), no signi cant differences were found compared to physical therapy treatments (22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some previous clinical trials have demonstrated improvements in walking ability in participants with neurological damage, such as stroke and spinal cord injury, who used a walking robot in their rehabilitation (10)(11)(12)(13)(14). In children with CP, reviews and meta-analyses have not found signi cant differences in the use of the walking robot compared to other physiotherapy treatments aimed at rehabilitating walking function (22,28,29). In a recent meta-analysis that included 8 clinical trials (2 nonrandomized), no signi cant differences were found compared to physical therapy treatments (22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The RAGT provides conditions that support motor learning principles such as intensity, repetition, task specificity, and participation [ 7 9 ]; as well as presenting beneficial effects for improving walking in subjects with brain and spinal cord damage [ 10 14 ]. Some studies have investigated the effects of the RAGT in improving gait function in CP subjects, showing an overall improvement in gait parameters (mainly gait speed, stride length and frequency), endurance, and gross motor function (Gross Motor Function Measure-88 (GMFM-88) dimensions D and E [ 15 21 ] A recent network meta-analysis of clinical trials concluded that although there is evidence to suggest that RAGT treatments are effective in children and adolescents with CP, no significant difference was found between RAGT and physiotherapy treatments in improving gait and standing [ 22 ]. Among the RAGT systems, there is the Walkbot (P&S Mechanics, Seoul, Korea) which consists of an exoskeletal RAGT system that is attached to the patient and helps him move his lower extremities on a treadmill, being attached by a harness to a crane, generating a personalized gait pattern for the patient [ 23 ], and provides ambulation that is closest to human kinematics and kinetics [ 24 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies with other exoskeletons without EMG biofeedback on patients with CP using i.e. the Lokomat only focus on children with CP and do not find any statistically significant changes in outcome variables such as walking speed or step length (Olmos-Gómez et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%