2016
DOI: 10.1111/ddi.12516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of roads and land use on frog distributions across spatial scales and regions in the Eastern and Central United States

Abstract: Aim Understanding the scales over which land use affects animal populations is critical for conservation planning, and it can provide information about the mechanisms that underlie correlations between species distributions and land use. We used a citizen science database of anuran surveys to examine the relationship between road density, land use and the distribution of frogs and toads across spatial scales and regions of the United States.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other scales shown to be relevant to urban pond ecosystems include 100 m for macroinvertebrates in West Midlands, UK (Thornhill et al 2017), 100-300 m for wetland birds in eastern Massachusetts, USA (Tavernia and Reed 2010), and 500 m for submerged and floating-leaved macrophytes in Hyogo, Japan (Akasaka et al 2010). Differences in the scale of influence have also been reported for the same taxonomic group (e.g., amphibians): 200 m in Gresham, Oregon, USA (Guderyahn et al 2016), 300-1000 m in the Eastern and Central USA (Marsh 2017), and 1 km in southeastern Australia (Villasenor et al 2017).…”
Section: Landscape-scale Factorsmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Other scales shown to be relevant to urban pond ecosystems include 100 m for macroinvertebrates in West Midlands, UK (Thornhill et al 2017), 100-300 m for wetland birds in eastern Massachusetts, USA (Tavernia and Reed 2010), and 500 m for submerged and floating-leaved macrophytes in Hyogo, Japan (Akasaka et al 2010). Differences in the scale of influence have also been reported for the same taxonomic group (e.g., amphibians): 200 m in Gresham, Oregon, USA (Guderyahn et al 2016), 300-1000 m in the Eastern and Central USA (Marsh 2017), and 1 km in southeastern Australia (Villasenor et al 2017).…”
Section: Landscape-scale Factorsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Differences in the scale of influence have also been reported for the same taxonomic group (e.g., amphibians): 200 m in Gresham, Oregon, USA (Guderyahn et al. ), 300–1000 m in the Eastern and Central USA (Marsh ), and 1 km in southeastern Australia (Villasenor et al. ).…”
Section: Impact Of Urbanization On the Biodiversity Of Urban Ponds Anmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Noise levels could be high in some highways, especially when heavy trucks make an important portion of the traffic volume (Eigenbrod, Hecnar and Fahrig, 2009). For instance, road density and noise affected frog species richness at the scale of ≤ 5 km in different landscapes in the United States (Marsh, et al, 2016). Other factors that may also affect protected areas within two kilometers of distance are illumination from vehicles at night and chemical pollutants carried by wind and runoff (Forman et al, 2003;Coffin, 2007;Leonard and Hochuli, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…그러나 오랫동안 인간의 주거지에서 나타나는 일부의 양서류 는 경관 조성의 변화에 내성을 나타내기도 한다 (Hartel et al 2010). 도시화에 따른 어떤 구체적인 환경의 변화 가 양서류에 영향을 미치는지에 대하여 잘 알려져 있지 않다 (Naito et al 2012, Marsh et al 2017.…”
Section: 서 론unclassified