1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)60977-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of riluzole on symptom progression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, the staggering complexity of this disorder and its fast progression have hampered the efforts to find an effective treatment. As a result, riluzole is the only FDA-approved drug for this disease, leading to a modest increase in survival (9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, the staggering complexity of this disorder and its fast progression have hampered the efforts to find an effective treatment. As a result, riluzole is the only FDA-approved drug for this disease, leading to a modest increase in survival (9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other trials of riluzole have been undertaken (Yanagisawa et al 1997;Sojka et al 1997;Riviere et al 1998;Kalra et al 1998;Desiato et al 1999;Arriada-Mendicoa et al 1999;Pongratz et al 2000;Couratier et al 2000;Debove C et al 2001;Lacomblez et al 2002), but the only trial to qualify for the Cochrane Review (Miller et al 2002), in addition to the two above, was of 168 patients outside the inclusion criteria for the Lacomblez and colleagues dose-ranging study . For the primary outcome measure (mortality or tracheostomy), at all time points at a dose of 100 mg/day, there was a 16% relative hazard reduction which did not quite reach statistical signifi cance (P = 0.056).…”
Section: The Meta-analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four RCTs were found that met the inclusion criteria for this review. [42][43][44][45] Eight further papers [46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53] that were possibly eligible based on their titles and abstracts were examined, but excluded for reasons explained below. None of the excluded studies were RCTs.…”
Section: Studies Identifiedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study by Riviere and co-workers (1998) 46 re-analysed previous trial data, and was therefore excluded. Trials by Sojka and colleagues (1997), 47 Kalra and colleagues (1998), 48 Gawel (unpublished; 1999), 49 Desiato and co-workers (1999) 51 and Couratier and co-workers (2000) 53 were excluded because subjects were not randomised. The trials by Arrida-Mendicoa and colleagues (1999) 50 and Pongratz and co-workers (1999) 52 were excluded because they did not use controls.…”
Section: Excluded Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation