2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of return air vent height on energy consumption, thermal comfort conditions and indoor air quality in an under floor air distribution system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They recommended that the return vents should be located at the upper boundary of the occupied zone for seating occupants (1.3 m). Likewise, the study by Heidarinejad et al [15] also revealed that positioning a return air vent at a lower level was beneficial to saving energy, but negative for the thermal comfort and IAQ in a small office. Apparently, most of the studies demonstrated that the optimum height of return vent in a small space was around 1.3 m in order to maintain a balance between the thermal comfort and energy saving [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They recommended that the return vents should be located at the upper boundary of the occupied zone for seating occupants (1.3 m). Likewise, the study by Heidarinejad et al [15] also revealed that positioning a return air vent at a lower level was beneficial to saving energy, but negative for the thermal comfort and IAQ in a small office. Apparently, most of the studies demonstrated that the optimum height of return vent in a small space was around 1.3 m in order to maintain a balance between the thermal comfort and energy saving [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Likewise, the study by Heidarinejad et al [15] also revealed that positioning a return air vent at a lower level was beneficial to saving energy, but negative for the thermal comfort and IAQ in a small office. Apparently, most of the studies demonstrated that the optimum height of return vent in a small space was around 1.3 m in order to maintain a balance between the thermal comfort and energy saving [14,15]. Furthermore, in our previous research [16], a series of numerical computations with various height positions (Z = 0.8 m-2.6 m) of the return vents were conducted in order to comprehensively evaluate the effects of the height of return vents on thermal comfort, contaminant removal, and energy efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Mijakowski and Sowa 21 proposed humidity-sensitive air inlets in a kindergarten building to improve the performance of passive stack ventilation, but the effect was not sufficient to meet current recommendations of Polish and European standards for indoor environments in newly designed kindergarten buildings. Ghassem et al 22 found that the height of return air vent from ceiling to floor could influence temperature gradient at the vertical direction, and thermal discomfort could be increased by reducing the height of the return air vent location. Kuo and Chung 23 investigated the effects of air vent location on occupants' thermal comfort in the occupied zone and suggested that the inlet diffuser should be located at the half-upper wall, if a wall-mounted diffuser is necessary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ghassem et al. 22 found that the height of return air vent from ceiling to floor could influence temperature gradient at the vertical direction, and thermal discomfort could be increased by reducing the height of the return air vent location. Kuo and Chung 23 investigated the effects of air vent location on occupants’ thermal comfort in the occupied zone and suggested that the inlet diffuser should be located at the half-upper wall, if a wall-mounted diffuser is necessary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers employed parametric studies [4][5][6] to achieve better performance of enclosed environments. In the parametric studies, one usually fixes all but one variable, and tries to optimize a cost function with respect to the non-fixed variable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%