2012
DOI: 10.3758/s13414-012-0283-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of retinal eccentricity and acuity on global-motion processing

Abstract: The present study assessed direction discrimination of moving random dot cinematograms (RDCs) at retinal eccentricities of 0, 8, 22 and 40 deg. In addition, Landolt C acuity was assessed at these eccentricities to determine whether changes in motion discrimination performance covaried with acuity in the retinal periphery. The results of the experiment indicated that discrimination thresholds increased with retinal eccentricity and directional variance (noise) independent of acuity. Psychophysical modeling indi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our experiment, baseline of peripheral visual acuity was 0.272° (mean), which is in line with previous findings showing a visual acuity of about 0.2° with ∼10° eccentricity (i.e. [30] , [31] ). Comparing baseline visual acuity in the chronology of sessions, we detected a small and continuous increase of performance, indicating a training effect.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In our experiment, baseline of peripheral visual acuity was 0.272° (mean), which is in line with previous findings showing a visual acuity of about 0.2° with ∼10° eccentricity (i.e. [30] , [31] ). Comparing baseline visual acuity in the chronology of sessions, we detected a small and continuous increase of performance, indicating a training effect.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Consistent with "foveal advantages" for 2-D motion discrimination (Bower, Bian, & Andersen, 2012;Orban, Van Calenbergh, De Bruyn, & Maes, 1985), self-motion perception (Crowell & Banks, 1993;Warren & Kurtz, 1992), and time-to-contact estimation (Regan & Vincent, 1995), we found that 3-D motion sensitivity decreased with eccentricity. These findings may partially stem from eccentricitydependent decreases in 2-D direction selectivity in visual cortex (Orban, Kennedy, & Bullier, 1986).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…If the button was pressed before gaze was on that target, peripheral vision was used for change detection. Since previous research has shown that motion-information changes facilitate the use peripheral vision (To, Regan, Wood, & Mollon, 2011), target-motion changes should be well detectable with peripheral vision, even as motion perception becomes incredibly less sensitive with increasing eccentricity (Bower, Bian, & Andersen, 2012;McKee & Nakayama, 1984;Yu et al, 2010). Due to the impaired acuity of peripheral vision in comparison to foveal vision, for form and motion changes of comparable salience, higher detection rates for target-motion than target-form changes were expected (for further details on the methods, see Vater et al, 2016).…”
Section: Monitoring Multiple Moving Objects With Peripheral Visionmentioning
confidence: 99%