2021
DOI: 10.3390/app11167760
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Resonant Electromagnetic Fields on Biofilm Formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Abstract: The global rise of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) constitutes a future health threat and dictates a need to explore alternative and non-chemical approaches. The aim of this study was to explore the use of weak resonant electromagnetic fields as a method to disrupt biofilm formation of a pathogenic bacterium in cystic fibrosis patients. We developed a bioresonance laboratory setup able to distinguish between changes in planktonic growth and changes in biofilm formation and showed that certain resonant frequenci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, recent research selected an analogous nitroxide radical undergoing an epoxy‐amine reaction as the ideal candidate for studying magnetic phenomena [27] . Interestingly, another study suggests that resonant magnetic fields may specifically interfere with microbial biofilm formation [28] . In the blending experiment mentioned above, the number of radicals was diluted with a non‐radical bearing monomer, minimizing the radical‐to‐radical interactions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, recent research selected an analogous nitroxide radical undergoing an epoxy‐amine reaction as the ideal candidate for studying magnetic phenomena [27] . Interestingly, another study suggests that resonant magnetic fields may specifically interfere with microbial biofilm formation [28] . In the blending experiment mentioned above, the number of radicals was diluted with a non‐radical bearing monomer, minimizing the radical‐to‐radical interactions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[27] Interestingly, another study suggests that resonant magnetic fields may specifically interfere with microbial biofilm formation. [28] In the blending experiment mentioned above, the number of radicals was diluted with a non-radical bearing monomer, minimizing the radical-to-radical interactions. However, inducing the radicals to orient in an ordered fashion by the external magnetic field in the blend enhanced radical-to-radical interactions, although these interactions are highly localized on the surface.…”
Section: Antimicrobial Performance Of Macroradical Epoxy Thin Filmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inhibition The effects of electromagnetic fields have recently been examined from a variety of perspectives. For example, Haagensen et al [55] have obtained interesting results from experiments with smaller flux densities and lower frequency ranges. Cample et al [56] performed experiments at the same magnetic flux density around 1 mT as the authors, but in a lower frequency range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the search for an affordable, dependable treatment for Lyme disease we are exploring the optimal therapeutic use of electromagnetic energy. A search of the literature yielded isolated in vitro research using magnetic fields for its direct antibacterial effects or potentiation of antibiotic therapy 1,3–12 . Earlier this year, we reported on five patients treated with high intensity electromagnetic energy for Post Treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome (PTLDS) or Chronic Lyme Disease (CLD) 13 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A search of the literature yielded isolated in vitro research using magnetic fields for its direct antibacterial effects or potentiation of antibiotic therapy. 1,[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Earlier this year, we reported on five patients treated with high intensity electromagnetic energy for Post Treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome (PTLDS) or Chronic Lyme Disease (CLD). 13 The number of treatments varied as well as the interval between treatments, ranging from days to months, due to patient location.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%