Effects of resistant starch on glycemic response, postprandial lipemia and appetite in subjects with type 2 diabetes

García-Vázquez, Carlos; Blé-Castillo, Jorge L.; Arias-Córdova, Yolanda; Ramos-García, Meztli; Olvera‐Hernández, Viridiana; Guzmán-Priego, Crystell Guadalupe; Martínez-López, Mirian Carolina; Jiménez-Domínguez, Guadalupe; Hernández-Becerra, Josafat A.

doi:10.1007/s00394-023-03154-4

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A study has shown no effect of NBS supplementation provided 40 g of RS during 4 days either on glycemic control or GV [ 41 ]. In contrast the same team comparing NBS with the same amount of RS and control after 4 days of consumption on glycemic responses have shown a reduction in fasting glycemia, peak glycemia and postprandial insulinemic responses after an oral meal tolerance test [ 42 ▪ ]. A review including 8 studies on T2D patients, confirmed this result and subgroup analyzes showed that this effect was greater in T2D patients compared with the prediabetic population [ 31 ▪▪ ].…”

Section: Effects Of Slowly Digestible Starch and Resistant Starch On ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

The impact of slowly digestible and resistant starch on glucose homeostasis and insulin resistance

Chisbert,

Castell,

Vinoy

et al. 2024

Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition &Amp; Metabolic Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose of review This review will summarize recent studies assessing the effect of slowly digestible starch (SDS) and resistant starch (RS) on glucose metabolism in healthy, prediabetic or type 2 diabetic adults. Recent findings Currently, a particular interest in starch and its digestibility has arisen, with data showing a positive effect of SDS and RS on the glucose homeostasis of healthy, at-risk, prediabetic and type 2 diabetic patients but research is ongoing. Summary Carbohydrates (CHO) and especially starch play a major role in the prevention and management of metabolic diseases such as type 2 diabetes (T2D). This largely depends on the quality and the digestibility (rate and extent) of the ingested starchy products, beyond their quantity. SDS have been poorly studied but display a beneficial effect on reducing glucose excursions in healthy and insulin-resistant subjects and a relevant potential to improve glucose control in type 2 diabetic individuals. As for RS, the results appear to be encouraging but remain heterogeneous, depending the nature of the RS and its role on microbiota modulation. Further studies are needed to confirm the present results and investigate the potential complementary beneficial effects of SDS and RS on long-term glucose homeostasis to prevent cardiometabolic diseases.

show abstract

Section: Effects Of Slowly Digestible Starch and Resistant Starch On ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

The impact of slowly digestible and resistant starch on glucose homeostasis and insulin resistance

Chisbert,

Castell,

Vinoy

et al. 2024

Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition &Amp; Metabolic Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Effects of resistant starch on glycemic response, postprandial lipemia and appetite in subjects with type 2 diabetes

Cited by 1 publication

References 39 publications

The impact of slowly digestible and resistant starch on glucose homeostasis and insulin resistance

The impact of slowly digestible and resistant starch on glucose homeostasis and insulin resistance

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About