2015
DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.4380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Motor Symptoms in Parkinson Disease

Abstract: IMPORTANCE Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a noninvasive neuromodulation technique that has been closely examined as a possible treatment for Parkinson disease (PD). However, results evaluating the effectiveness of rTMS in PD are mixed, mostly owing to low statistical power or variety in individual rTMS protocols.OBJECTIVES To determine the rTMS effects on motor dysfunction in patients with PD and to examine potential factors that modulate the rTMS effects.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
133
4
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(130 reference statements)
4
133
4
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, many studies were not sham-controlled and for sham-controlled studies, different methods of sham stimulation have been used: tilted [33,37,54,56,60,62], sham [39,47,63] and inactive coils [50,66,68] have been used, as well as occipital stimulation [40,49,61], coil back surface [41] and realistic sham [51,57,58]. A very recent review [69] examined 20 RCTs of rTMS treatment for motor dysfunction in PD to evaluate the efficacy of treatment and identify protocols factors that moderate the effects of treatment. The authors reported a significant medium effect size (standardized mean difference -SMD = 0.46) favoring active rTMS over sham treatment in the reduction of motor symptoms in PD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, many studies were not sham-controlled and for sham-controlled studies, different methods of sham stimulation have been used: tilted [33,37,54,56,60,62], sham [39,47,63] and inactive coils [50,66,68] have been used, as well as occipital stimulation [40,49,61], coil back surface [41] and realistic sham [51,57,58]. A very recent review [69] examined 20 RCTs of rTMS treatment for motor dysfunction in PD to evaluate the efficacy of treatment and identify protocols factors that moderate the effects of treatment. The authors reported a significant medium effect size (standardized mean difference -SMD = 0.46) favoring active rTMS over sham treatment in the reduction of motor symptoms in PD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study by Zhu et al, which point to at similar issue concerning the potential of rTMS in the treatment of PD, is supported by another recent meta-analysis by Chou et al (7). In all, 20 shamcontrolled randomised controlled trials with a total of 470 patients were included.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Therapeutic studies of non-invasive brain stimulation, including repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), have yielded promising results in PD. Two meta-analyses concluded that there was a modest therapeutic effect of rTMS in motor performance in PD, 3,4 with no safety concerns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%