2015
DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2014.09.0204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of repetitive low-level blast exposure on visual system and ocular structures

Abstract: Abstract-The purpose of this study was to determine whether repetitive exposure to low-level blasts during military breacher training produces acute and cumulative damage to the ocular tissues or visual system. The effects of low-level blast exposure on high-contrast visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, oculomotor function, color vision, visual field (VF), pupillary light reflex, corneal endothelial cell density (ECD), macular thickness, retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, and cup-to-disc ratio were assessed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Repeated exposure to low-level blast is a characteristic of a few select occupations, to include specialized military and law enforcement units [ 40 ]. Specifically, with regard to military breacher training, personnel are typically exposed to 500–600 low-level blasts per year during their two to three training program [ 41 ]. Consequently, the polytrauma associated with blast injuries during military training and operations present serious challenges with respect to clinical assessments and rehabilitation efforts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Repeated exposure to low-level blast is a characteristic of a few select occupations, to include specialized military and law enforcement units [ 40 ]. Specifically, with regard to military breacher training, personnel are typically exposed to 500–600 low-level blasts per year during their two to three training program [ 41 ]. Consequently, the polytrauma associated with blast injuries during military training and operations present serious challenges with respect to clinical assessments and rehabilitation efforts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blast injuries to sensory systems, to include ocular and auditory, are among the most significant concerns of healthcare providers due to their high prevalence over the past few decades. In line with these concerns, recent literature has highlighted the negative effects of blast on visual and auditory function [ 9 , 41 43 ] and provided additional insight into the pathophysiology of blast. The findings presented herein, provide further evidence of the effects of blast, namely on pain and inflammatory processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To examine appropriate driver pressure, various combinations of 0.003" and 0.005" polyethylene sheets were assessed in combination with various driver pressure thresholds, until the correct combinations were found to reliably reproduce waves corresponding to 6, 8, 10 and 15 psi, based in literature representations of mild BINT. The Canadian Army and US Army Doctrines specify exposure limits of 3 and 4 psi (respectively) for overpressure during range training 47,48 , however helmet-mounted sensors have detected frequent repetitive exposures at or above 6 psi [49][50][51] . There is now evidence that repetitive subconcussive blast events may elicit the same symptoms as those seen for mTBI, particularly in the operational scenario in which repeated blasts are experienced within a short .…”
Section: Determination Of Blast Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, previous research on LLB is limited in several ways. Studies on human participants have relied on very small samples (typically fewer than 40 participants in military and law enforcement samples) [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ]. Additionally, these studies often investigated self-reported subclinical symptoms, which may not correspond to clinically diagnosable injuries [ 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%