2003
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-003-1414-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of repeated withdrawal episodes, nicotine dose, and duration of nicotine exposure on the severity and duration of nicotine withdrawal in rats

Abstract: Increases in total nicotine dose resulted in increased severity of the affective aspects of withdrawal. Further, continuous drug exposure resulted in longer lasting withdrawal than intermittent administration even when the total nicotine dose was the same. There was no correlation between threshold elevations and somatic signs of withdrawal. In conclusion, the severity of nicotine withdrawal is mitigated by characteristics of the drug exposure regimen such as drug dose, duration of exposure and whether exposur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
72
2
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
10
72
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This 1-month duration is unusual compared to the 1-to 7-day effect seen in rats withdrawn from chronic amphetamine (eg Leith and Barrett, 1976;Kokkinidis and Zacharko, 1980;Kokkinidis et al, 1986;Lin et al, 1999;Paterson et al, 2000), cocaine Koob, 1991, 1992a;Baldo et al, 1999), opiates (Schulteis et al, 1994), ethanol (Schulteis et al, 1995), and nicotine (Epping-Jordan et al, 1998;Harrison et al, 2001). Further, attempts to increase the duration of the effect of amphetamine and nicotine withdrawal on reward threshold using repeated withdrawal from continuous administration of these drugs were not successful (Paterson et al, 2000;Skjei and Markou, 2003). Interestingly, when nicotine was given for a prolonged period of time (ie 28 vs 7 days via subcutaneous osmotic minipumps), rats exhibited a 14-15 day elevation in brain reward threshold during the subsequent withdrawal that was independent of the dose administered (Skjei and Markou, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This 1-month duration is unusual compared to the 1-to 7-day effect seen in rats withdrawn from chronic amphetamine (eg Leith and Barrett, 1976;Kokkinidis and Zacharko, 1980;Kokkinidis et al, 1986;Lin et al, 1999;Paterson et al, 2000), cocaine Koob, 1991, 1992a;Baldo et al, 1999), opiates (Schulteis et al, 1994), ethanol (Schulteis et al, 1995), and nicotine (Epping-Jordan et al, 1998;Harrison et al, 2001). Further, attempts to increase the duration of the effect of amphetamine and nicotine withdrawal on reward threshold using repeated withdrawal from continuous administration of these drugs were not successful (Paterson et al, 2000;Skjei and Markou, 2003). Interestingly, when nicotine was given for a prolonged period of time (ie 28 vs 7 days via subcutaneous osmotic minipumps), rats exhibited a 14-15 day elevation in brain reward threshold during the subsequent withdrawal that was independent of the dose administered (Skjei and Markou, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Further, attempts to increase the duration of the effect of amphetamine and nicotine withdrawal on reward threshold using repeated withdrawal from continuous administration of these drugs were not successful (Paterson et al, 2000;Skjei and Markou, 2003). Interestingly, when nicotine was given for a prolonged period of time (ie 28 vs 7 days via subcutaneous osmotic minipumps), rats exhibited a 14-15 day elevation in brain reward threshold during the subsequent withdrawal that was independent of the dose administered (Skjei and Markou, 2003). Thus, it is hypothesized here that the duration of the chronic drug treatment is an important factor in determining the duration and magnitude of the brain reward deficit, and further investigation of this relation may offer new insights into the specificity of the neurobiological mechanisms underlying the enduring affective disturbances associated with long periods of drug use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnitude of nicotine dependence, as well as the negative state and dysphoria associated with nicotine withdrawal, are good predictors of smoking relapse (Ockene et al, 2000). Indeed, ICSS studies in rats demonstrate reduced sensitivity to rewarding stimulation (anhedonia) following spontaneous withdrawal from nicotine minipump extraction (Skjei and Markou, 2003;Kenny et al, 2003a;Yamada et al, 2010;Epping-Jordan et al, 1998;Vlachou et al, 2011). However, the persistence of anhedonia following nicotine withdrawal is not a consistent finding in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Withdrawal-related decreases in the brain reward system in humans has been modeled using the intracranial self stimulation (ICSS) procedure, in which rats press a lever to deliver electrical stimulation to reward-related brain areas. Nicotine withdrawal increases ICSS threshold [26,81,156]. Thus, several nicotine withdrawal symptoms reported in humans have been modeled and studied in rodents.…”
Section: Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors: Animal Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%