2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2014.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of repeated electroejaculations on kinematic sperm subpopulations and quality markers of Mexican creole goats

Abstract: Here we show the effects of repeated electroejaculation (EE) on mean values of motility, mitochondrial functionality, and expression of active caspases on goat sperm obtained by EE. Evaluations were done using CASA and flow cytometry. A strategy for identification of kinematic sperm subpopulations, when individual data of sperm are not provided by the CASA system, is provided. Fifty semen samples, five of each of ten adult creole goats, were obtained by electroejaculation. Mean values of total motility, progre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a well-grounded statistical model to determine the number of clusters (subpopulations) to be considered is not yet available for CASA data (Martínez-Pastor et al 2011). Most of these studies considered variations in the frequencies of determined motile subpopulations to assess differences among individual or repeated ejaculates (Vázquez et al 2015;Kanno et al 2017), possible fertility of ejaculates (Quintero-Moreno et al 2007;García-Á lvarez et al 2014) and the effect of short-term storage and cryopreservation on sperm quality (Martinez-Pastor et al 2005;Núñez-Martínez et al 2006;Dorado et al 2011).…”
Section: Motility Subpopulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a well-grounded statistical model to determine the number of clusters (subpopulations) to be considered is not yet available for CASA data (Martínez-Pastor et al 2011). Most of these studies considered variations in the frequencies of determined motile subpopulations to assess differences among individual or repeated ejaculates (Vázquez et al 2015;Kanno et al 2017), possible fertility of ejaculates (Quintero-Moreno et al 2007;García-Á lvarez et al 2014) and the effect of short-term storage and cryopreservation on sperm quality (Martinez-Pastor et al 2005;Núñez-Martínez et al 2006;Dorado et al 2011).…”
Section: Motility Subpopulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motile sperm subpopulations exists in any semen sample . Sexual steroids are important regulators of reproduction at distinct levels, but their effects on sperm subpopulations have not been fully explored .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existence of sperm cell subpopulations in semen is widely accepted , and is more evident when multiple parameters are evaluated. The use of a CASA (computer‐assisted sperm analysis) system permits the objective evaluation of multiple parameters of motility.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another aspect is that the correct determination of sperm tracks results in a fundamental shift in the determination of motility and morphology subpopulation structure. The fact that an ejaculate is constituted of different subpopulations of spermatozoa has been well established in a great variety of species (boar (Abaigar, Holt, Harrison, & del Barrio, ; Flores et al., ; Holt, Holt, & Moore, ; Soler et al., ), bull (Valverde et al., ; Yániz et al., ), donkey (Flores et al., ), eel (Gallego et al., ), fox (Soler et al., , ), gazelle (Abaigar et al., ), goat (Vázquez et al., ), ram (Luna et al., ), stallion (Ortega‐Ferrusola et al., ), human (Vásquez, Soler, Camps, Valverde, & García‐Molina, ; Yániz et al., ), salmon (Caldeira et al., )), but most of these studies were not designed for considering the effect of the FR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%