2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2003.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of removing small fragments with ultrafiltration treatment and ultrasonic conditions on the degradation kinetics of chitosan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data in Figure 3 show that molecular weight of 0.2, 0.8, 1.4, and 2.0% chitosan decreased over time during the mechanical shearing for those either with or without concurrent UF treatment to remove the degraded small fragments at 0, 30, and 50 C. Similar degradation patterns have been reported in the literature regarding chitosan, 13,16,18 pullulan, 37 agarose, j-carrageenan, and i-carrageenan.…”
Section: Effect Of Reaction Timesupporting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The data in Figure 3 show that molecular weight of 0.2, 0.8, 1.4, and 2.0% chitosan decreased over time during the mechanical shearing for those either with or without concurrent UF treatment to remove the degraded small fragments at 0, 30, and 50 C. Similar degradation patterns have been reported in the literature regarding chitosan, 13,16,18 pullulan, 37 agarose, j-carrageenan, and i-carrageenan.…”
Section: Effect Of Reaction Timesupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The rate constants were 1.0-2.0 and 1.3-1.6 times higher for that using UF treatment than for that without UF treatment using ultrasonic radiation and microfluidization to degrade the different concentrations (0.2-2.0%) 84% DD chitosan solutions at 0, 30, and 50 C. 18,26 The increased efficiency of UF treatment reported in this study (1.8-6.0 times) is higher than when using ultrasonic radiation and microfluidization. This may be due to the fact that the degradation mechanism of mechanical shearing differs from ultrasonic radiation and microfluidization.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chitosan samples with different MWs were prepared by ultrasonic degradation. 26,27 The properties of these samples are listed in Table I.…”
Section: Preparation Of Chitosans With Different Mwsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are the major factors causing the degradation of polymers. [17][18][19][20] Application of high-intensity ultrasound to dispersions of carbohydrates can lead to depolymerization because of the intense mechanical and chemical effects associated with cavitation. [21][22][23][24] Cavitational thermolysis may produce hydroxyl radicals and hydrogen atoms that can be followed by formation of hydrogen peroxide.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%