2018
DOI: 10.1111/aab.12462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of removing sheep grazing on soil chemistry, plant nutrition and forage digestibility: Lessons for rewilding the British uplands

Abstract: This document is the authors' final manuscript version of the journal article, incorporating any revisions agreed during the peer review process. There may be differences between this and the publisher's version. You are advised to consult the publisher's version if you wish to cite from this article.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The recovery of vegetation after a reduction in grazing should reduce rates of overland flow (Bond et al, 2020), with impacts on downstream flooding. In our study reduced grazing was introduced fairly recently ($ 7 years ago) and whilst relatively little is known about the effects of reducing stock grazing pressures, it may take 48-62 years to see the benefits of reduced grazing due to the long-term soil degradation caused by intensive sheep-grazing and slow rates of recovery (Marrs et al, 2018;Marrs et al, 2020).…”
Section: Soil Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The recovery of vegetation after a reduction in grazing should reduce rates of overland flow (Bond et al, 2020), with impacts on downstream flooding. In our study reduced grazing was introduced fairly recently ($ 7 years ago) and whilst relatively little is known about the effects of reducing stock grazing pressures, it may take 48-62 years to see the benefits of reduced grazing due to the long-term soil degradation caused by intensive sheep-grazing and slow rates of recovery (Marrs et al, 2018;Marrs et al, 2020).…”
Section: Soil Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Controlled observations (quadrants) N (wildlife grazing) Mallik and Gimingham (1983), Hobbs and Gimingham (1984) and Gong (1976) Howden Moor, Sheffield (GB) Aerial photographs N (wildlife grazing) Harris et al (2011) and Allen et al (2016) Knettishall Heath, East Anglia (GB) Aerial photographs 1946Aerial photographs , 1951Aerial photographs , 1967Aerial photographs , 1976 Some tree removal 1979 Marrs et al (1986) Kringsjå, Rogaland (NO) Aerial photographs N (wildlife grazing) Gjedrem and Log (2020) N (wildlife grazing) Marrs (1992;Marrs et al, 2018) and Milligan et al (2016) for keeping the heathlands in place? And how does this scale of ecological resilience correlate with the archaeological evidence for past heathland regimes?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One positive approach to land abandonment that is currently gaining momentum is re-wilding/wilding (henceforth referred to as wilding), which in its simplest form is the removal/reduction in livestock grazing with the intention that this will improve the conservation benefit of grassland and shrublands (Sandom et al, 2013;Marrs et al, 2018Marrs et al, , 2020. This belief is inherent in the "wet-desert" description of the British uplands by Frank Fraser Darling (1955), who argued that sheep-grazing, in particular, was very detrimental to British upland plant communities, reducing the species diversity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 sheep ha -1 in 2001. The studies, therefore, compare no sheep grazing to the "business-as-usual" grazing pressure across the North Pennines reserve over a considerable timescale (Milligan et al, 2016Marrs et al, 2018). As these upland plant communities have been traditionally considered degraded by overgrazing (McGovern et al, 2011), conservation managers expected that grazing reductions would lead to an improvement in the conservation value of the vegetation, by increasing diversity including bryophytes and lichens, and by reducing the abundance of unpalatable species (Marrs et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%