Effects of Remedial Measures Implemented after Waterlogging on Cotton

Jiang, Zhen-Hui; Zhua, Jian-Qiang; Yang, Wei; Lia, Ming-Feng; Yua, Yang

doi:10.1109/isdea.2012.164

Cited by 9 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…(2012) observed 27–30 % yield reduction after 4–9 days of waterlogging, respectively, during early reproductive stage in cotton. A 10-day exposure significantly increased young boll and square abscission in cotton, leading to a 42 % yield reduction ( Jiang et al . 2013 ).…”

Section: Root Growthmentioning

confidence: 99%

Consequences of waterlogging in cotton and opportunities for mitigation of yield losses

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cotton is a major world crop that is notoriously susceptible to waterlogging damage, particularly when cultivated on fine-textured soils. However, damage is also exacerbated because of inadequate acclimation of roots to low oxygen levels, and secondary effects on shoots. Despite the commercial importance of cotton, very little has been published when compared with waterlogged cereals. This review provides a comprehensive view of the constraints on cotton in low-oxygen conditions, including absence of aerenchyma and the inadequacy of fermentation to overcome waterlogging damage. We emphasise the possibilities of improved tolerance through management practices, manipulation of hormone pathways and gene technologies to modify perception and response to low-oxygen environments.

show abstract

Section: Root Growthmentioning

confidence: 99%

Consequences of waterlogging in cotton and opportunities for mitigation of yield losses

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Previous studies have shown that under waterlogging, both intermittent waterlogging due to extended irrigation, and waterlogging alone during the flowering and boll‐setting stages led to cotton yield loss (Hodgson, 1982; Bange et al, 2004; Kuai et al, 2015; Zhang et al, 2016b), and the yield loss during the early stages of waterlogging was greater than that during the later stages (Bange et al, 2004). Moreover, cotton yield loss increased as waterlogging duration increased (Wu et al, 2012; Jiang et al, 2013; Kuai et al, 2015; Zhang et al, 2016b). Under drought, cotton yield loss also increased as the drought stress level increased (Kang et al, 2012; Yang et al, 2015; Wang et al, 2016).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effect of Water Deficit and Waterlogging on the Yield Components of Cotton

Wang

et al. 2018

Crop Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objectives of this study were to determine the influence of waterlogging alone, drought alone, and alternating drought and waterlogging on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) yield and yield components. Water deficit and waterlogging experiments were conducted at the flowering and boll‐setting stages of cotton. The lint and cottonseed yields were reduced after waterlogging alone, drought alone, and alternating drought and waterlogging. The lint and cottonseed yields under alternating drought and waterlogging were greater than those under drought alone. When alternating drought and waterlogging, the drought stage decreased the lint and cottonseed yields, whereas the waterlogging stage had a compensatory effect. The decrease in the number of opening bolls might be the major reason for the observed decrease in lint and cottonseed yields. Waterlogging alone, drought alone, and alternating drought and waterlogging all led to an increase in the proportion of the boll wall biomass and a decrease in the proportion of the fiber biomass of cotton bolls. The proportion of the seed biomass of cotton bolls always decreased, except under alternating drought and heavy waterlogging in 2015. The fiber/seed biomass ratio decreased, except under drought alone in 2015. These findings might provide data to support the prevention of cotton yield loss under drought and waterlogging.

show abstract

“…In another study, cotton yield was found to be reduced by 27–30% at 4 d to 9 d of WL exposure [ 47 ]. Jiang et al [ 48 ] reported that 10 d of WL significantly affected the number of bolls in cotton plants, leading to a 42% reduction in fiber yield.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Reproductive Stage-Waterlogging on the Growth and Yield of Upland Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)

Somaddar

Mia

Khalil

et al. 2023

Plants

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The reproductive stage of cotton (Gossypium sp.) is highly sensitive to waterlogging. The identification of potential elite upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) cultivar(s) having higher waterlogging tolerance is crucial to expanding cotton cultivation in the low-lying areas. The present study was designed to investigate the effect of waterlogging on the reproductive development of four elite upland cotton cultivars, namely, Rupali-1, CB-12, CB-13, and DM-3, against four waterlogging durations (e.g., 0, 3, 6, and 9-day). Waterlogging stress significantly impacted morpho-physiological, biochemical, and yield attributes of cotton. Two cotton cultivars, e.g., CB-12 and Rupali-1, showed the lowest reduction in plant height (6 and 9%, respectively) and boll weight (8 and 5%, respectively) at the highest waterlogging duration of 9 days. Physiological and biochemical data revealed that higher leaf chlorophyll, proline, and relative water contents, and lower malondialdehyde contents, particularly in CB-12 and Rupali-1, were positively correlated with yield. Notably, CB-12 and Rupali-1 had higher seed cotton weight (90.34 and 83.10 g, respectively), lint weight (40.12 and 39.32 g, respectively), and seed weight (49.47 and 43.78 g, respectively) per plant than CB-13 and DM-3 in response to the highest duration of waterlogging of 9 days. Moreover, extensive multivariate analyses like Spearman correlation and the principle component analysis revealed that CB-12 and Rupali-1 had greater coefficients in yield and physiological attributes at 9-day waterlogging, whereas CB-13 and DM-3 were sensitive cultivars in response to the same levels of waterlogging. Thus, CB-12 and Rupali-1 might be well adapted to the low-lying waterlogging-prone areas for high and sustained yield.

show abstract

Effects of Remedial Measures Implemented after Waterlogging on Cotton

Cited by 9 publications

References 0 publications

Consequences of waterlogging in cotton and opportunities for mitigation of yield losses

Consequences of waterlogging in cotton and opportunities for mitigation of yield losses

The Effect of Water Deficit and Waterlogging on the Yield Components of Cotton

Effect of Reproductive Stage-Waterlogging on the Growth and Yield of Upland Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About