2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cja.2015.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of relative thickness on aerodynamic characteristics of airfoil at a low Reynolds number

Abstract: Please cite this article as: M. Dongli, Z. Yanping, Q. Yuhang, L. Guanxiong, Effects of relative thickness on aerodynamic characteristics of airfoil at a low Reynolds number, (2015), doi: http://dx. AbstractThis study focuses on the characteristics of low Reynolds number flow around airfoil of high-altitude unmanned aerial vehicles (HAUAVs) cruising at low speed. Numerical simulation on the flows around several representative airfoils is carried out to investigate the low Reynolds number flow. The water tunnel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main criteria to select an airfoil are [3,19,33,34] (1) provide the required lift and minimize the drag; (2) the maximum lift coefficient (C Lmax ) should be high to increase angle of attack causing stall; (3) the thickness of the airfoil (t) should be as thin as possible to avoid the formation of the laminar separation bubble (LSB) [35,36]. At the same time, to place some of the electrical components inside the wing, the maximum thickness of a MAV should be between 8 and 11 % of the chord.…”
Section: Determination Of the Characteristics Of The Wingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main criteria to select an airfoil are [3,19,33,34] (1) provide the required lift and minimize the drag; (2) the maximum lift coefficient (C Lmax ) should be high to increase angle of attack causing stall; (3) the thickness of the airfoil (t) should be as thin as possible to avoid the formation of the laminar separation bubble (LSB) [35,36]. At the same time, to place some of the electrical components inside the wing, the maximum thickness of a MAV should be between 8 and 11 % of the chord.…”
Section: Determination Of the Characteristics Of The Wingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Content may change prior to final publication. calculations [18]. In this study, the Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes equations are solved using the γ-Reθ transition model from Menter and Langtry for closure [19].…”
Section: ) Radar Antenna Parameterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the unavailability of experimental data in most of the real icing conditions, the accuracy of CFD predictions cannot always be validated. But there are some CFD studies [30][31][32][33][34] on iced aerofoils that have been validated with available experimental data. Their results show that a high-quality mesh is necessary, especially in the case of large horn ice shapes; as well as an appropriate turbulence model in addition to a transition model.…”
Section: Aerodynamic Characterization Of Iced Aerofoilsmentioning
confidence: 99%