2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.12.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of reduced cost-sharing on children's health: Evidence from Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We believe our study complements Takaku’s [ 15 ] in two aspects. First, we use administrative admission data which cover large areas of Japan.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We believe our study complements Takaku’s [ 15 ] in two aspects. First, we use administrative admission data which cover large areas of Japan.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…In Japan, Takaku [ 15 ] conducted a study on the impact of medical subsidies for children, specifically the effect of expanded outpatient care subsidy, using data from a nationally representative questionnaire survey conducted by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW). He found that the subsidy improved subjective health measures but did not reduce hospitalization for pre-school children, whereas it had no effect on the subjective health measures or hospitalization for school-aged children.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Unfortunately, health status is also unavailable in the data, and it is highly likely that a potential bias in the estimates remains. If health at admission is the same for MA and PHI patients, one good way to separate these effects is to employ the subsample of patients aged 3 and under, because the copayment for PHI patients aged 3 and under has been fully covered by prefectural public subsidy since 1994 [ 52 , 53 ]. This means the major difference between MA and PHI patients is the health capital stock based on family income level because the actual copayment of any patient aged 3 and under is zero.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%