2006
DOI: 10.1139/f05-251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of recreational and commercial fishing on blue sharks (Prionace glauca) in Atlantic Canada, with inferences on the North Atlantic population

Abstract: The nominal catch of blue sharks (Prionace glauca) reported for the Canadian Atlantic grossly underestimates the annual catch mortality of about 1000 tonnes (t), making blue sharks the most frequently caught large shark in Canadian waters. Although blue sharks accounted for 99% of all sharks landed at recreational shark fishing tournaments, tournament catches accounted for only 3% of total fishing mortality. Standardized catch rate indices suggested a decline in blue shark abundance of about 5%–6%·year–1 since… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
76
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
76
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Commercial exploitation is a larger contributor to their overall extinction risk compared to recreational fishing (Worm et al 2013). Although it is generally accepted that shark fishing mortality is much higher in commercial fisheries than in the recreational sector (Pine et al 2008) and that fishing mortality in general is more detrimental to shark populations than other anthropogenic impacts, sharks have been highly prized in recreational fisheries globally since the mid-20th century, and is a growing source of significant mortality (Pepperell 1992, Campana et al 2006). In the USA alone, more large sharks were killed by recreational anglers than commercial fishers in 2013 (Lowther & Liddel 2014, Shiffman 2014.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commercial exploitation is a larger contributor to their overall extinction risk compared to recreational fishing (Worm et al 2013). Although it is generally accepted that shark fishing mortality is much higher in commercial fisheries than in the recreational sector (Pine et al 2008) and that fishing mortality in general is more detrimental to shark populations than other anthropogenic impacts, sharks have been highly prized in recreational fisheries globally since the mid-20th century, and is a growing source of significant mortality (Pepperell 1992, Campana et al 2006). In the USA alone, more large sharks were killed by recreational anglers than commercial fishers in 2013 (Lowther & Liddel 2014, Shiffman 2014.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many shark species that are targeted commercially, caught and harvested as bycatch, or captured incidentally and released by recreational or commercial fishers are at risk of over-exploitation and possible extinction (Baum et al 2005;Campana et al 2006;Myers et al 2007). Significant population declines of the grey nurse shark, Carcharias taurus (Rafinesque 1810), throughout most of its range has resulted in it being listed as Vulnerable on the World Conservation Union's Red List of threatened species (IUCN 2009) and Critically Endangered on the Australian east coast (Bansemer and Bennett 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(c) CPUE (North Atlantic) -The mean recent pelagic longline CPUE of blue sharks across several nations fishing for sharks in the North Atlantic was 18.4 sharks·1000 hooks -1 , corresponding to 430 kg·1000 hooks -1 (Campana et al 2006). North Atlantic pelagic longline effort was the value used in Campana et al (2009).…”
Section: Estimation Of Shark Catchmentioning
confidence: 99%