“…But, in addition, a considerable increase in the thickness of the layer was measured at points C and D. This variation was associated, not with heating by electromagnetic induction; which depends on the intensity of the magnetic field, the frequency of the working current, the separation between the piece and the inductor coil, as well as the magnetic characteristics of the material to be treated; if not to the geometric shape of the piece. In addition to the above, the austenitizing time is also a variable that influences the depth of penetration of the temper and showed a clear trend specifically at points C and D where it was observed that at austenitizing times of 2.0 and 2.2 s the thickness the layer was less; Cunningham et al [11] indicate that the variations in the depth of the layer are due, in the case of induction by a single shot, to the exposure time of the steel above the critical temperature A3, for which it was concluded that the geometry of the piece mainly influenced the temperature reached in the different areas of the piece, and that areas A and B were exposed to a shorter time to induction heating compared to points C and D. Figure 8 shows the results of the thermodynamic simulation with the JmatPro software, where the chemical composition of the AISI 1045 steel is considered, in addition to the ASTM grain size, whose value was determined experimentally, only for the austenitized sample for 2.4 s, and it was 9 ASTM at a temperature of 1123 K. The simulation was used in order to appreciate and confirm what was reported by Cyderman et al [4], who determined that at short heating times the grain size decreases and the surface hardness of the hardened layer decreases.…”