Sociality in Bats 2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-38953-0_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Range, Habitat and Roosting Ecology in Patterns of Group Association in Bats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The subtropical K. furva formed distinct social groups, and those groups were relatively stable year-round. The stable social groups have been reported for some tropical bats (e.g., Chaverri, 2010;Kerth, 2008;Sagot, 2016;. In contrast to other social bats, the average SRI values of K. furva (0.04-0.07) are similar to that of Phyllostomus hastatus (0.059), Desmodus rotundus (0.021-0.061), and Myotis septentrionalis (0.057), but are lower than that of S. bilineata (0.107-0.112), T. tricolor (0.099-0.136), Rhynchonycteris naso (0.126-0.167), and Myotis bechsteinii (0.262) (reviewed by .…”
Section: Association Pattern and Demographic Traits Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The subtropical K. furva formed distinct social groups, and those groups were relatively stable year-round. The stable social groups have been reported for some tropical bats (e.g., Chaverri, 2010;Kerth, 2008;Sagot, 2016;. In contrast to other social bats, the average SRI values of K. furva (0.04-0.07) are similar to that of Phyllostomus hastatus (0.059), Desmodus rotundus (0.021-0.061), and Myotis septentrionalis (0.057), but are lower than that of S. bilineata (0.107-0.112), T. tricolor (0.099-0.136), Rhynchonycteris naso (0.126-0.167), and Myotis bechsteinii (0.262) (reviewed by .…”
Section: Association Pattern and Demographic Traits Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The majority of bat species live in groups that range from a few individuals to millions (Kunz & Lumsden, 2003). The stability of groups in bats differs according to environmental conditions and roost characteristics (Sagot, 2016). For example, temperate bats generally exhibit mixed-sex aggregations during hibernation and the mating season but usually demonstrate sexual segregation at parturition, in which reproductive females and pups form maternity colonies and males live solitarily or form bachelor groups (Bradbury, 1977;McCracken & Wilkinson, 2000;Sagot, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, many groups of bats contain complex social systems in which animals engage in a diversity of social behaviours (Kerth, 2008;Harten et al, 2019;Carter and Wilkinson, 2013;Knörnschild et al, 2012). Little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus) form stable colonies (i.e., that persist throughout the reproductive season) of many thousands of individuals usually in permanent roosts such as caves and mines (Fenton and Barclay, 1980;Langwig et al, 2012;Sagot, 2016). Although it has been suggested that social systems of little brown bat colonies are relatively simple in comparison to some bat species, evidence of social behaviours such as vocal communication during interactions, swarming and even social learning indicate that the social environment plays an important role in the lives of these animals (Barclay et al, 1979;Schowalter, 1980;Gaudet and Brock fenton, 1984).…”
Section: Social Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%