2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2006.01.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of rainfall on soil–structure system frequency: Examples based on poroelasticity and a comparison with full-scale measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These tendencies are consistent with the numerical results published by Todorovska and Al Rjoub (2006b), who present differences of around 2 % for a 2D model. The results are also in line with the experimental data presented by Todorovska and Al Rjoub (2006a) on the observed increase in the apparent frequencies of Millikan library in Pasadena, California, after heavy rainfall.…”
Section: Soil-structure Interaction Problem In Poroelastic Soilssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These tendencies are consistent with the numerical results published by Todorovska and Al Rjoub (2006b), who present differences of around 2 % for a 2D model. The results are also in line with the experimental data presented by Todorovska and Al Rjoub (2006a) on the observed increase in the apparent frequencies of Millikan library in Pasadena, California, after heavy rainfall.…”
Section: Soil-structure Interaction Problem In Poroelastic Soilssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These properties correspond to a viscoelastic medium equivalent to the dry soil reported in Todorovska and Al Rjoub (2006a).…”
Section: Soil-structure Interaction Problem In Viscoelastic Soilmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Theoretical calculations based on poromechanics representation of the soil matrix and comparisons of the frequencies of the soil-structure system between dry conditions and conditions of saturation by fluids are in excellent agreement with the observed changes in the system frequencies [91,92].…”
Section: Millikan Library (Ml)supporting
confidence: 65%
“…In their study, the foundation was modeled as an axisymmetric rigid massless body and the dynamic interaction problem was solved by an integral equation method. Todorovska and Rjoub [30,31] used a simple two-dimensional soil-structure interaction model for a building supported by a rigid circular foundation embedded in a poroelastic half space. These studies provided useful insight into the effect of dynamic interaction between the side of the foundation and the surrounding soil on the dynamic response of rigid embedded foundations in poroelastic soil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%