Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
The effects of mono- and bifunctional furocoumarins plus UVA radiation (PUVA and related treatments) on the human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) promoter were studied using HeLa cells stably transfected with the chloramphenicol acetyl transferase gene under the control of the HIV-1 promoter. The experiments were performed with three psoralens (5-methoxypsoralen, 5-MOP; 8-methoxypsoralen, 8-MOP; and 4'-aminomethyl-4,8,5'-trimethylpsoralen, AMT) and four angelicins (angelicin; 4,5'-dimethylangelicin, 4,5'-DMA; 6,4'-dimethylangelicin, 6,4'-DMA; and 4,6,4'-trimethylangelicin, TMA). The drugs alone and UVA radiation alone showed no effect on the HIV promoter. However, when the cells were incubated with the furocoumarins at 0.1-40 micrograms/mL and then irradiated, the HIV promoter was activated in distinct fluence ranges, i.e. (1) no promoter activity was discernible at low fluences (e.g. at 0.1 microgram/mL of 8-MOP up to 100 kJ/m2), (2) as the fluence was increased, the promoter activity increased to reach a maximum (10-50-fold with respect to the unexposed samples), and (3) as the fluence was further increased, the promoter activity decreased. Similar (although shifted on the fluence scale) patterns were observed with either > 340-nm UVA radiation or with UVA radiation contaminated with a small amount of UVB radiation (typical for PUVA lamps). The effective fluences were inversely related to the drug concentration. Experiments with 5-MOP and 8-MOP indicated reciprocity of the drug concentration and radiation fluence. The HIV promoter response patterns were similar for monofunctional angelicins and bifunctional psoralens.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
The effects of mono- and bifunctional furocoumarins plus UVA radiation (PUVA and related treatments) on the human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) promoter were studied using HeLa cells stably transfected with the chloramphenicol acetyl transferase gene under the control of the HIV-1 promoter. The experiments were performed with three psoralens (5-methoxypsoralen, 5-MOP; 8-methoxypsoralen, 8-MOP; and 4'-aminomethyl-4,8,5'-trimethylpsoralen, AMT) and four angelicins (angelicin; 4,5'-dimethylangelicin, 4,5'-DMA; 6,4'-dimethylangelicin, 6,4'-DMA; and 4,6,4'-trimethylangelicin, TMA). The drugs alone and UVA radiation alone showed no effect on the HIV promoter. However, when the cells were incubated with the furocoumarins at 0.1-40 micrograms/mL and then irradiated, the HIV promoter was activated in distinct fluence ranges, i.e. (1) no promoter activity was discernible at low fluences (e.g. at 0.1 microgram/mL of 8-MOP up to 100 kJ/m2), (2) as the fluence was increased, the promoter activity increased to reach a maximum (10-50-fold with respect to the unexposed samples), and (3) as the fluence was further increased, the promoter activity decreased. Similar (although shifted on the fluence scale) patterns were observed with either > 340-nm UVA radiation or with UVA radiation contaminated with a small amount of UVB radiation (typical for PUVA lamps). The effective fluences were inversely related to the drug concentration. Experiments with 5-MOP and 8-MOP indicated reciprocity of the drug concentration and radiation fluence. The HIV promoter response patterns were similar for monofunctional angelicins and bifunctional psoralens.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
This paper presents the first attempt to evaluate the potential of clinical UV exposures to induce the human immunodeficiency (HIV) promoter and, thus, to upregulate HIV growth in those skin cells that are directly affected by the exposure. Using the data for HIV promoter activation in vitro, we computed UVB and psoralen plus UVA (PUVA) doses that produce 50% of the maximal promoter activation (AD50). Then, using (a) literature data for UV transmittance in the human skin, (b) a composite action spectrum for HIV promoter and pyrimidine dimer induction by UVB and (c) an action spectrum for DNA synthesis inhibition by PUVA, we estimated the distribution of medical UVB and PUVA doses in the skin. This allowed us to estimate how deep into the skin the HIV-activating doses might penetrate in an initial and an advanced stage of UVB or PUVA therapy. Such analysis was done for normal type II skin and for single exposures. The results allow us to predict where in the skin the HIV promoter may be induced by selected small and large therapeutic UVB or PUVA doses. To accommodate changes in skin topography due to disease and UV therapy, our considerations would require further refinements. For UVB we found that, when the incident dose on the surface of the skin is 500 J/m2 (290-320 nm) (initial stage of the therapy), the dose producing 50% of the maximal HIV promoter activation (ADUVB50) is limited to the stratum corneum. However, with an incident dose of 5000 J/m2 (an advanced stage of the therapy), ADUVB50) may be delivered as far as the living cells of the epidermis and even to some parts of the upper dermis. For PUVA we found that, when the incident UVA doses are 25 or 100 kJ/m2 (320-400 nm) (an initial and an advanced stage of therapy, respectively), and the 8-methoxypsoralen concentration in the blood is 0.1 microgram/mL (the desired level), the combined doses to the mid epidermis (and some areas of the upper dermis) are well below the 50% HIV promoter-activating PUVA dose (ADPUVA50). Only under the worst scenario conditions, i.e. an exceptionally high drug concentration in the patient's tissues and localization of HIV in the nearest proximity to the skin surface, would the combined PUVA dose expected during photochemotherapy exceed ADPUVA50. These results suggest that the probability of HIV activation in the epidermis by direct mechanisms is higher for UVB than for PUVA treatment. However, complexities of the UV-inducible HIV activation and immunomodulatory phenomena are such that our results by themselves should not be taken as an indication that UVB therapy carries a higher risk than PUVA therapy when administered to HIV-infected patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.