1991
DOI: 10.1097/00008506-199109000-00058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of propofol, etomidate, midazolam and fentanyl on motor evoked responses to transcranial electrical or magnetic stimulation in humans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of the induction dose of diazepam and fentanyl is limited after 10–20 min and a stable MEP is observed ( 3). The use of a target controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol is more and more accepted as an intravenous technique for the maintenance of anaesthesia ( 8).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The effect of the induction dose of diazepam and fentanyl is limited after 10–20 min and a stable MEP is observed ( 3). The use of a target controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol is more and more accepted as an intravenous technique for the maintenance of anaesthesia ( 8).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Doubling the propofol infusion not only causes a deeper level of anaesthesia but, very likely, sets up inhibitory events to electrical stimulation at the level of the motor cortex. In our setup, those inhibitory events cannot be ruled out to be active at the motor neuron pool in the anterior horn as well ( 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation